Search found 25 matches
- Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:16 pm
- Forum: General AMV
- Topic: EFF Wins New Legal Protections for Video Remixing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1668
Re: EFF Wins New Legal Protections for Video Remixing
My reading of p. 27 - 31 tells me that "fictional films" do not benefit from this expansion at all. IANAL, but looking over that section there are several distinctions made, and it does not appear to me that "fictional" works which also are both "transformative" and "noncommercial" would necessaril...
- Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:11 pm
- Forum: General AMV
- Topic: EFF Wins New Legal Protections for Video Remixing
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1668
EFF Wins New Legal Protections for Video Remixing
EFF Wins New Legal Protections for Video Remixing Copyright Office Announces Exemptions to Mitigate DMCA Harms Crucial support for the successful request on behalf of video remix artists – carving out new legal protection for this important art form – was provided by the Organization for Transforma...
- Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:50 am
- Forum: AMV Contests
- Topic: Otakon 2008 AMV Contest Results
- Replies: 134
- Views: 34591
THANK YOU! Man I must be blind. I found that other page with just the creators and gave up too fast.NightMistress85 wrote:Scroll down to Cyanna's second post:
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/phpBB/v ... hp?t=90155
- Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:07 am
- Forum: AMV Contests
- Topic: Otakon 2008 AMV Contest Results
- Replies: 134
- Views: 34591
- Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:59 pm
- Forum: General AMV
- Topic: is anyone else concerned about the RIAA's ... part 2
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2082
So, as you can see, we're using something for which someone is entitled to payment, without paying for it. Stealing. Excellent quotation, would you consider following it up with a proper legal definition of "fair use" as well? Particularly of interest would be how "fair use" was defined before 1997...
- Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:16 pm
- Forum: General AMV
- Topic: is anyone else concerned about the RIAA's recent activity?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6455
i dont know why they would do that. our argument is free fan art, where the artists voluntarily share their work with the whole wide world. musical artists cant complain because the music had to come from somewhere, which is MOST LIKELY bought for better sound quality, rather than file-shared and d...
- Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:43 pm
- Forum: General AMV
- Topic: is anyone else concerned about the RIAA's recent activity?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6455
What's the link to that thread that explained this topic in full detail? And why isn't it a sticky? ;) I would love to see such a thing. I looked and found a lengthy thread about the Trusted Computing initiative, but that's not at all what I'm expressing concern about. I'm also not expressing conce...
- Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:30 pm
- Forum: General AMV
- Topic: is anyone else concerned about the RIAA's recent activity?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6455
Have we had this discussion before? Yes. But I think it's a threat most of us should be pretty used to living with by now. It's not like it's anything new, honestly. I agree that the concern is nothing new, but I also believe that this latest incident marks behavior "unprecedented" by the RIAA. I, ...
- Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:08 am
- Forum: General AMV
- Topic: is anyone else concerned about the RIAA's recent activity?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6455
Legally, I think it could be argued either way. But, even assuming that we were legally in the right and that it all falls under "fair use," one's legal rights make precious little difference. a-m-v.org doesn't really have the resources to fight it out for years, the eventual court decision as to "...
- Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:19 am
- Forum: General AMV
- Topic: is anyone else concerned about the RIAA's recent activity?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6455
One question, however. If we moved the servers outside of America, then the RIAA would have no say in shutting them down, right (granted the process will take a while)? Just making sure I'm on the same page here. IANAL, but if the DNS and hosting were managed offshore, by people offshore, then yes ...