You are able to get it from here thoughGuide wrote:Because of the license this software is released under, the encoder could not be directly included in the AMVApp
NEW Guides and AmvApp BETA
- WC Annihilus
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:49 pm
- Scintilla
- (for EXTREME)
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:47 pm
- Status: Quo
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
- WC Annihilus
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:49 pm
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
- Tiiscool
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:51 am
- Location: Alstätte, Germany
- Contact:
- Kira_Douji
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:38 pm
- Qyot27
- Surreptitious fluffy bunny
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:08 pm
- Status: Creepin' between the bullfrogs
- Location: St. Pete, FL
- Contact:
Concerning the Nero AAC issue:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=130832
So maybe things will get straightened out, but there's no telling when.
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=130832
So maybe things will get straightened out, but there's no telling when.
- Qyot27
- Surreptitious fluffy bunny
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:08 pm
- Status: Creepin' between the bullfrogs
- Location: St. Pete, FL
- Contact:
It's now back up at this address:Qyot27 wrote:Concerning the Nero AAC issue:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=130832
So maybe things will get straightened out, but there's no telling when.
http://www.nero.com/eng/nero-aac-codec.html
- Qyot27
- Surreptitious fluffy bunny
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:08 pm
- Status: Creepin' between the bullfrogs
- Location: St. Pete, FL
- Contact:
I think it would be advisable to explain some of the differences when encoding AAC streams. Particularly because of the fact that the High Efficiency profile (HE-AAC) isn't meant to be used with high bitrates, like videos distributed locally would aim for most of the time, and yet I'm seeing it getting used anyway. The default Low Complexity profile should be used instead for bitrates that aren't intentionally low, like the case would be for streaming (i.e. under 80 kbps, as that's about the cutoff for HE-AAC's usefulness with normal audio streams).
The reason is that, unless the encoder is wonky, HE-AAC achieves the quality it does by halving the frequency so that the low bitrate doesn't negatively affect things, and uses SBR to attempt to restore the lost frequencies. It can't perfectly replicate the lost data, though, and using LC at higher bitrates close to transparency (which are the bitrates I'm seeing used as it is) does a better job at preserving the audio quality, as it doesn't toss out the frequency information.
Videos I've downloaded that actually used HE-AAC correctly had very audible degradation of the sound quality, although it did certainly sound better than the bitrate that was used (mainly 64 kbps) would have sounded otherwise. However, there's truckloads of them which superficially report the use of HE-AAC but CoreAAC reports no transformation of the frequency, and the files really are still 44.1 or 48 kHz, which means that the High Efficiency hinting isn't there and the report is a false positive, or isn't doing anything if it is there.
Also it might help to reiterate the fact that iTunes Plus purchases can be converted without needing to be decrypted first. Even if it is redundant and completely obvious, it is worth noting (especially since the Plus versions are also higher bitrate than typical Store purchases).
The reason is that, unless the encoder is wonky, HE-AAC achieves the quality it does by halving the frequency so that the low bitrate doesn't negatively affect things, and uses SBR to attempt to restore the lost frequencies. It can't perfectly replicate the lost data, though, and using LC at higher bitrates close to transparency (which are the bitrates I'm seeing used as it is) does a better job at preserving the audio quality, as it doesn't toss out the frequency information.
Videos I've downloaded that actually used HE-AAC correctly had very audible degradation of the sound quality, although it did certainly sound better than the bitrate that was used (mainly 64 kbps) would have sounded otherwise. However, there's truckloads of them which superficially report the use of HE-AAC but CoreAAC reports no transformation of the frequency, and the files really are still 44.1 or 48 kHz, which means that the High Efficiency hinting isn't there and the report is a false positive, or isn't doing anything if it is there.
Also it might help to reiterate the fact that iTunes Plus purchases can be converted without needing to be decrypted first. Even if it is redundant and completely obvious, it is worth noting (especially since the Plus versions are also higher bitrate than typical Store purchases).
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
As far as the guide goes, aac encoding is explained through the use of my zarx264gui, which does not give you an option to use he-aac or not (its selected automatically by the encoder, and as long as you use a decent bitrate it should come out fine).
Granted, some people may be working with other tools, in which case this might be worth mentioning... but at the same time I don't really know if it's that necessary. There would have to be a new section added in which to explain this at, and there doesn't exist anything explaining what all of the options in LAME do, so I'm kind of inclined to lean towards thinking that if people are using something other than what I include in the amvapp, they should research all such options on their own.
Anyone else want to weigh in on this?
Granted, some people may be working with other tools, in which case this might be worth mentioning... but at the same time I don't really know if it's that necessary. There would have to be a new section added in which to explain this at, and there doesn't exist anything explaining what all of the options in LAME do, so I'm kind of inclined to lean towards thinking that if people are using something other than what I include in the amvapp, they should research all such options on their own.
Anyone else want to weigh in on this?