Hey! Listen! [higher frame rates]

User avatar
GreenT
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 8:03 pm
Status: Brainstorming
Location: Canada
Org Profile

Hey! Listen! [higher frame rates]

Post by GreenT » Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:31 pm

How the hell are videos made at 59.94 fps? o_o Looky, this is the AMV I'm talking about.

User avatar
Rapture**
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:19 pm
Location: Vilnius , Lithuania
Org Profile

Post by Rapture** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:35 pm

It's not such of big deal.. I've seen somewhere in my codecs 90 FPS rendering allowed.. :?
:D I like laughter ;DD
ImageImage

User avatar
badmartialarts
Bad Martial Artist
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:31 am
Location: In ur Kitchen Stadium, eatin ur peppurz
Org Profile

Post by badmartialarts » Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:05 pm

The same way you make a video at 29.97 or 23.976...just more frames. I tried making a 60 fps progressive video one time for the hell of it. Played back just fine but the cuts were too fast to really follow with my eyes. Plus putting down 60 frames to get a second of video done was super annoying.
Life's short.
eBayhard.

User avatar
Phantasmagoriat
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:26 pm
Status: ☁SteamPunked≈☂
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Phantasmagoriat » Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:04 pm

... heh...

can I assume you saw my last thread?... [i posted a link to the exact same video :lol: ]

...anyways, it probably depends on your export program. I'm using Magix MEP10, and I know that the frame-rate is just a property you can set. The key thing is that the clips must be sped up at least 2.5x. This ensures that every frame in a given second is unique. [24pfs x 2.5 = 60fps]. Not sure if it is as simple with other programs :?

In case you are interested, I plan to export my next video at 59.94fps...
...so keep an eye out for it...
maybe I'll send you a beta or something......

User avatar
ROSS HEAVY INDUSTRIES
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:25 am
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by ROSS HEAVY INDUSTRIES » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:01 pm

Doesn't make sense to export at 60fps, since NTSC is 29.97 and most of your source would be NTSC or PAL

User avatar
Sereenie
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 8:11 pm
Location: The City Fun Forgot
Org Profile

Post by Sereenie » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:13 pm

What I'm wondering is, what's the point? The file will end up bigger, but I'm not sure it will look better.

Or am I missing something?

S.

User avatar
Niotex
The Phantom Canine
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2003 1:54 pm
Status: Simply Insane
Location: Netherlands
Org Profile

Post by Niotex » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:17 pm

The only way you can make 60 fps or higher pay off right now is if you make orignal graphics and compositions rather then just a straight cut video or a noobish fx video.
Image

User avatar
Zarxrax
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Zarxrax » Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:43 pm

Niotex wrote:The only way you can make 60 fps or higher pay off right now is if you make orignal graphics and compositions rather then just a straight cut video or a noobish fx video.
Its possible for 60fps to help a video that uses plain editing as well. I shall demonstrate this wonderfully with my next AMV :p

User avatar
Phantasmagoriat
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:26 pm
Status: ☁SteamPunked≈☂
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Phantasmagoriat » Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:00 pm

Zarxrax wrote:I shall demonstrate this wonderfully with my next AMV :p
And here I convinced myself this was my idea [damn... other people thought of it too *shakes fist*]

... hmm... I should finish my project and beat you to it...
although I suppose it wouldn't be the first 60fps vid [said video-- are there any others?]

User avatar
Zarxrax
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Zarxrax » Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:45 pm

Yea, theres been quite a few 60 fps videos, mainly from Japanese editors though.

Locked

Return to “Video & Audio Help”