Hello,
It seems that Aspect Ratio is one of the most difficult topics
I am a little confused about the numbers I read in EADFAG:
Background:
Footage (DVD) -> add Pictures -> Editing -> Resizing for Encoding
Footage: has TV PAR, looks squetched, "not square pixel"
Pictures: has to get the same squetching like the footage, so it gets first PAR 1 and then it is resized to TV PAR
Resizing for Encoding: Sometimes we want PAR 1, so the video is resized to PAR 1, but because of mod16 we have to "adjust" it a little
mod16: this means that mpeg2 saves the data in 16 x 16 blocks, and so horizontally and vertically it has to be a multiple of 16.
Footage (TV PAR) -> Picture make (PAR 1) resize to (TV PAR) -> editing -> resizing whole video to (PAR 1) with mod16
Here are the numbers in EADFAG:
Resizing the picture: PAR 1 to TV PAR:
PAL (16:9): 1024x576 (PAR 1) to 720x576 (TV PAR)
NTSC (16:9): 848x480 (PAR 1?) to 720x480 (TV PAR)
Explanation PAL:
720 x 576,
576 * 16/9 = 1024
Because 1024 is 16 * 64, we do not need to adjust it.
So for NTSC, this is my opinion:
Pictures:
720 x480, 480 *16/9 = 853,33
The Pictures get the same squitchiness like the footage.
I think that here the mod16 rule is not necessary??
Footage Resizing:
But 853,33 is not a multiple of 16, we have to adjust it.
So we get: 848 x 480
When this is right, (I am still a noob) it would be nice to have two resizing explanation: one for pictures and one for the video.
Best regards,
Ti
Aspect Ratio and mod16 rule question
- Tiiscool
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:51 am
- Location: Alstätte, Germany
- Contact:
- Keeper of Hellfire
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 am
- Location: Germany
Simply said - if you draw your picture, make it the correct AR for square pixels, so 640x480 for 4:3. For 16:9, it doesn't matter much if you make it 853x480 or 848x480, since it's less than 1% difference. No one will note it. Make it how you like it. Before exporting the picture, resize it to 720 x 480.
- Keeper of Hellfire
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 am
- Location: Germany
- Tiiscool
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:51 am
- Location: Alstätte, Germany
- Contact:
Aspect Ratio
Hello,
@Keeper of Hellfire, thanks for your answer.
I still have the view of a noob, and becaue the topic aspect ratio is really difficult, I think it should not be confusing.
First I thought I did understand it, then I was wondering about this number 848. EADFAG is really great, special for people who do not now anything about video. (I love it) So when we have parts which are confusing, we should try to get them easy.
Best regards,
Ti
@Keeper of Hellfire, thanks for your answer.
Of course you are right. It is only a little different.Keeper of Hellfire wrote:Simply said - if you draw your picture, make it the correct AR for square pixels, so 640x480 for 4:3. For 16:9, it doesn't matter much if you make it 853x480 or 848x480, since it's less than 1% difference. No one will note it. Make it how you like it. Before exporting the picture, resize it to 720 x 480.
I still have the view of a noob, and becaue the topic aspect ratio is really difficult, I think it should not be confusing.
First I thought I did understand it, then I was wondering about this number 848. EADFAG is really great, special for people who do not now anything about video. (I love it) So when we have parts which are confusing, we should try to get them easy.
Best regards,
Ti