Can you?

[jbone]

I'm not pissed, I was being clam and very literal. I just think think your post was pretty stupid, rediculous, and pointless. So like I said, people say those things, and if you make stupid recidulous, pointless posts every where, I'm not surprised. That's all I'm saying.

I'm always fascinated how the more intelligent people on the site tend to immediately understand what I say and why, and the people who are quicker to pass judgement and don't even try to understand what I'm saying percieve it simply as they want to see it (based on the less intelligent peoples' opinions of me), and therefore get annoyed with me.

Thanks for the laugh.

[jbone]

btw, by adobe I ment adobe premiere, and the less to manage would be what you just mentioned

Oh, and "adobe" is a type of clay often used to build houses. It is also the name of a developer of computer software. It is not a video editor. To refer to a developer of many, many types of still and motion design software as nothing more than a single video editor is ludicrous.

If nobody points out the faux pas, "adobe" is liable to be as obfuscatious as "smurf" -

"I opened adobe and made my image in adobe then I exported from adobe to adobe and added some of the stuff with the adobe plugins then opened up a timeline in adobe and added my adobe image (that I started in adobe) then I opened adobe and typed my report on adobe, and I used adobe because it let me use the pictures I made in adobe."

[FirestormXIII]

"I opened adobe and made my image in adobe then I exported from adobe to adobe and added some of the stuff with the adobe plugins then opened up a timeline in adobe and added my adobe image (that I started in adobe) then I opened adobe and typed my report on adobe, and I used adobe because it let me use the pictures I made in adobe."

The consequences...the consequences...

*Eyes reach back and throttle brain in an attempt to retain their sanity*

[Jace Tsunami]

I was refering to adobe premiere, how could you not get that. It's ALMOST the only adobe application ever talked about on this site, and it's constantly being brought up. Uh yeah, I was tlaking about clay, because clay fits into this thread PERFECTLY. It was so incredibly stupid for you to say what you did, and I'm sticking to that. You coulda have mentioned how I was reffering to premiere, which obviously you picked up. to to tell me in such a way that mkaes it seem like you're tell ing me off (stress seem there) and then go as far to correct me in the way you did was rude, and stupid.

First, Adobe doesn't do it, Premiere does it.

you could have simply said exactly what you said afterwards but without the second, and I would have never had a problem at all. What you did was rude, and stupid. Why wouldn't some one be anoyed by this?

[jbone]

you could have simply said exactly what you said afterwards but without the second, and I would have never had a problem at all. What you did was rude, and stupid. Why wouldn't some one be anoyed by this?

Why is the second thing I said stupid or rude, when I was simply correcting a blatant error?

[Jace Tsunami]

I ment take out the word second, not the statement. because if you never had a first, wouldn't the word second just sound a little funny?

[jbone]

I ment take out the word second, not the statement. because if you never had a first, wouldn't the word second just sound a little funny?

So, you're saying that one blatant mistake is okay, but the other is not? that just makes no sense.

You're highly amusing.

[RichLather]

I missed you, man.

[Jace Tsunami]

if you list things and number them they'll go about something like this:

first, second, third, and so on.

If you hadn't made your first comment at all, then there wouldn't have been a need to say second. I didn't say you made a mistake, I said it would have sounded just fine if you dropped the second and the first statement altogether. Like I have been saying, rude and stupid. What's even dumber is you're still at it.

So, you're saying that one blatant mistake is okay, but the other is not? that just makes no sense.

You're trying to put words in my mouth, I won't let you, I've never said anyhting along those lines, and if you can't understand what I'm saying, because I believe this is the second time I've had to explain myself now, then you've got a problem.

[jbone]

if you list things and number them they'll go about something like this:

first, second, third, and so on.

I'm impressed, you can count.

If you hadn't made your first comment at all, then there wouldn't have been a need to say second.

And you can reason. Wow, will wonders never cease?

I didn't say you made a mistake,

Right. *I* said *you* did.

I said it would have sounded just fine if you dropped the second and the first statement altogether.

Why drop either statement when you were incorrect on both counts and the second point was especially valid?

Like I have been saying, rude and stupid. What's even dumber is you're still at it.

What you haven't seemed to figure out yet is that I'm enjoying your inanity. And you do realize that the person you're calling stupid was the one who said the correct things?

So, you're saying that one blatant mistake is okay, but the other is not? that just makes no sense.

You're trying to put words in my mouth, I won't let you, I've never said anyhting along those lines, and if you can't understand what I'm saying, because I believe this is the second time I've had to explain myself now, then you've got a problem.

I was refering to adobe premiere, ... [to] go as far to correct me in the way you did was ... stupid.

...

you could have simply said exactly what you said afterwards ... and I would have never had a problem at all.

'Nuff said.