An idea

DarkDragonMaster · Post by **DarkDragonMaster** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:12 pm

don't put as many restrictions on avatar size, it is really frikin' annoying.

Lyrs · Post by **Lyrs** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:20 pm

no.

/get over it

Zarxrax · Post by **Zarxrax** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 8:16 pm

People with big avatars are frikin' annoying too.

Brsrk · Post by **Brsrk** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 8:17 pm

Lyrs wrote:no.

/get over it

x2

It's like this for bandwidth reasons... When you get up to 15 avatars per page, it really slaughters the bandwidth (and makes it very slow for dialup)...

Imagine if all of them were around 200x200 and were bitmaps. Would you want resitrictions? I think the current situation is fine and it should remain this way until Phade changes his mind about it...

Until then, deal with it or get over it...

azulmagia · Post by **azulmagia** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:03 pm

The avatars are fine, it's the sigs that could be larger.

Zarxrax · Post by **Zarxrax** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:06 pm

They already let us have sigs twice as large as they used to.

azulmagia · Post by **azulmagia** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:13 pm

Zarxrax wrote:They already let us have sigs twice as large as they used to.

I thought it was the other way round....anyway I didn't have ocremix sized sigs in mind (them and their 32x32 avatars

) ....maybe 80 pixel height, to eliminate having to stack sigs.

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:15 pm

Meh. Do we really need another way to enchance our egos around here?

Naw. Keep it simple folks. What's on now is just fine, so long as it's used creatively.

fyrtenheimer · Post by **fyrtenheimer** » Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:02 pm

it's just an avatar, and just a sig

..that's all

LoST RaiNDRoP · Post by **LoST RaiNDRoP** » Tue Apr 20, 2004 12:43 pm

azulmagia wrote:The avatars are fine, it's the sigs that could be larger.

x2