Spell checking issue solved!
- The Floyd
- Darwen Uhword Runherup
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:38 pm
- Location: The Wall
Spell checking issue solved!
www.google.com now has their new google toolbar available. This nifty gadget have the ability to spell check posts on fourms. Sweet Deal!!!
The Floyd
"I wich I had spel cheeking."
"I wich I had spel cheeking."
- AbsoluteDestiny
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2001 1:56 pm
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
- Otohiko
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:32 pm
Yeah, I feel quite sorry for people with big hands/fingers.
And then even I had a bad spell a week or two ago when I kept mistyping stuff like crazy...
...anyway, perhaps the problem shouldn't be there at all, since for those who are so darn conscious of their spelling problems, there are always word processors - type up your reply there, then post it.
And then even I had a bad spell a week or two ago when I kept mistyping stuff like crazy...
...anyway, perhaps the problem shouldn't be there at all, since for those who are so darn conscious of their spelling problems, there are always word processors - type up your reply there, then post it.
The Birds are using humanity in order to throw something terrifying at this green pig. And then what happens to us all later, that’s simply not important to them…
- bum
- 17747114553
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 9:56 pm
Their's a spell checker extention for firefox with varios dictionaries. However I fid it beter not to use it and to just push myself to type properly. making a small mistake or 2 in a post should make any different, long as its neat and reable english (not leet or sms language)
I manage fine with mine with my gigantic hands which measure at um..... 1.8 12cm cd's.Otohiko wrote:Yeah, I feel quite sorry for people with big hands/fingers.
- Otohiko
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:32 pm
I can't tell if that paragraph was intentional.bum wrote:Their's a spell checker extention for firefox with varios dictionaries. However I fid it beter not to use it and to just push myself to type properly. making a small mistake or 2 in a post should make any different, long as its neat and reable english (not leet or sms language)
Though honestly, I don't think bad spelling is such a big deal. You (ok, *I*) can manage to make absolutely no sense whatsoever without making a single spelling or grammar error.
And I was told that I have very 'girly' hands...
***
Anyways, what was the original intention of the thread here? I don't think the Google toolbar is a forum feature, but rather a browser feature. In which case it's not particularly a site suggestion, rather a suggestion to its' users.
Or is that a suggestion to suggest it to its' users?
The Birds are using humanity in order to throw something terrifying at this green pig. And then what happens to us all later, that’s simply not important to them…
- The Floyd
- Darwen Uhword Runherup
- Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:38 pm
- Location: The Wall
It was merely informative for posters. I can imagine there are people out there wishing this forum had spell checking. The question may have been asked before. Plus, I figure this is the best place to post such a thread considering the information's value to some people.
The Floyd
"I wich I had spel cheeking."
"I wich I had spel cheeking."
-
- is
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
- Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
- Location: N????????????????
In the spirit of that comment, I would like to point out that KHTML, KDE's HTML rendering engine, has a spell-checker with misspelled word highlighting built into every form component.The Floyd wrote:It was merely informative for posters. I can imagine there are people out there wishing this forum had spell checking. The question may have been asked before. Plus, I figure this is the best place to post such a thread considering the information's value to some people.
So, uh, I guess you should switch over to a GNU/Linux system running KDE, or something.