Daredevil

This forum is for actual topics of discussion that do not fit the above categories.
Locked
User avatar
Jace Tsunami
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 5:56 am
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Jace Tsunami » Mon Feb 17, 2003 12:28 am

dare devil = decent
because dardevil had many shots of Jenifer garner! and her fabulous rack!

Ben aflec = Crap *check*
but you forgot
Jennifer garner = Amazon Goddess
http://www.punkaddict.com

myspace.com/punkaddict

User avatar
Farlo
expectations of deliberate annihilation
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:04 am
Status: The Dark Host
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Farlo » Mon Feb 17, 2003 12:30 am

the rack was nice but i was too dsiturbed by the constant sucking sound the movie made to notice it much

User avatar
gadoo
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 4:04 am
Location: LA
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by gadoo » Mon Feb 17, 2003 1:40 am

so I'm guessing the movie sucked then ...yes?

NME
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2001 1:11 am
Status: nauseating bliss
Location: Far Country
Org Profile

Post by NME » Mon Feb 17, 2003 2:12 am

Like a dirty, dirty whore.
nil per os

User avatar
Jace Tsunami
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 5:56 am
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Jace Tsunami » Mon Feb 17, 2003 2:18 am

I liked it!

it all depends on tastes, do you like to ENJOY movies, or do you like to judge them?

Most people ge ttheir movie jollys out by critising them. If it wasn't ahrd to make, and it wasn't an absolutley incredible screen play then it must suck.

Dare Devil was a cool comic, he was a cool super hero. He came to life on the bi screen and it's that simple. I myself think it's fun to watch things like that, i'm in no way sorry that I septn a measly 5.50 on a dare devil Ticket. I enjoyed myself.

I evev liked triple X, and for that movie there were tons of people going, "oh ofcourse he can do that, cuz he's van diesal right, psh!" What I saw was a fictional character named X doing that. So like I said, it depends on how you look at movies, I liekd DD
http://www.punkaddict.com

myspace.com/punkaddict

User avatar
gadoo
Joined: Thu May 09, 2002 4:04 am
Location: LA
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by gadoo » Mon Feb 17, 2003 3:43 am

so, this is not a movie for a person who's not a comic fan

User avatar
Farlo
expectations of deliberate annihilation
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:04 am
Status: The Dark Host
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Farlo » Mon Feb 17, 2003 4:02 am

not a movie for people who like good movies

User avatar
Farlo
expectations of deliberate annihilation
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:04 am
Status: The Dark Host
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Farlo » Mon Feb 17, 2003 4:04 am

it blows circus migets for nickels :twisted:

User avatar
Wykith
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 3:39 pm
Org Profile

Post by Wykith » Mon Feb 17, 2003 9:31 am

A popcorn selling timewaster for the mindless masses.

And yes Jace, if the screenplay sucks the movie tends to suck too. Of course I can see the point in going to a movie with crap acting, crap CG, crap story line, crap battles, crap screenplay, a crap concept and a crap cast cause oooooh da action.

Duuuuude. So it like.......EXPLODED!!
"And now you will shed tears of crimson."
"I don't have an attitude problem. I have an attitude. It's your problem."
Your message has been entered successfully

User avatar
KhayotiK
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 8:58 pm
Location: Sesame Street.
Org Profile

Post by KhayotiK » Mon Feb 17, 2003 4:53 pm

Exploding crap? This movie sounds like a jackass spinoff...
Image Image

Locked

Return to “General Off Topic”