religon yes or no

Lyrs · Post by **Lyrs** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:34 am

so minniemoose, are you saying that pedophilia, necrophilia, and homosexuality is right? is okay?

WarpedElements · Post by **WarpedElements** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:37 am

No, i'm saying that liberals generally say Homosexuality is ok, so why do they cringe at the others. It's called devil's advocate. You want one thing but you gotta accept the whole package deal babe.

I'm whole heartedly against all perverse relationships like that.

post-it · Post by **post-it** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:41 am

hmmm

Well this much we do know - it was a letter `written to someone "at one time in the past"
and no one can argue that point ( it had to come from somewhere ) and was not meant to be
placed on the Mantle over some Fire Place for warming the house and ignored - after all;
how would you feel if you wrote somebody a letter and all they did was put it on a shelf
and never read it!? (( if it were me writing that letter; I'd be hurt if not upset! ))

However, by the way it was written we can tell that the one who wrote it was not stupid!

We also know what the subject of the letter was but as to who wrote it and why; that is unclear!

Scholars agree upon one basic understanding thou slightly jaded, it was not written in anyones
time frame ( a spicific date, time or day ) and as such must be give proper respect for the
wisdom of the writer(s)

dcdeveloperx · Post by **dcdeveloperx** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:46 am

i dont get one word u said post it

Lyrs · Post by **Lyrs** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:49 am

MinnieMoose wrote:No, i'm saying that liberals generally say Homosexuality is ok, so why do they cringe at the others.

they choose to accept one and not the others.

It's called devil's advocate. You want one thing but you gotta accept the whole package deal babe.

no you don't. you can pick and choose because those are three seperate issues. just because they may seem all disgusting doesn't mean that each of them is like the other.

I'm whole heartedly against all perverse relationships like that.

you still have a lot to experience and people to know

WarpedElements · Post by **WarpedElements** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:52 am

No, they're all the same. They're immoral and unnatural relationships. They just involve different living creatures.

Arson, Murder, Theft, all crimes, all wrong

Homosexuality, beastiality, pedophilia, all unnatural sex-related bad things.

WarpedElements · Post by **WarpedElements** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:57 am

Wait, how can you accept homosexuality as "normal" but not the others. how are they so different? They're NOT. It's just the other person's "sexual preference" and shit. Explain how they're THAT different.

LightningCountX · Post by **LightningCountX** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:00 pm

Alright, time to pretty much wrap up what I wrote for an English essay....

"Religion"

I find religion the biggest peice of shit on the planet...It is for people who are lost, and need something to blame for when things go bad(this character is "God")People have different ways of believing in "God" and find their ways to be the best way to worship "God" and have to automatically kill anyone who doesn't follow their way of believing "God" examples.....Palistine and Israel, 9/11, The Crusades, Protestants Vs Catholics in Ireland.... and other stuff...People are jailed, tourtured, killed because they are too fucking stupid to understand that they are making all this stupid shit up....and people will say "Oh, but the bible says..." the bible was written by some idiots on speed...shit, we all know nobody walks on water...are you seeing me walk on water??????um, no jackass....This is all stupid shit that puts even more physical and emotional pain on people...and you should be ashamed for believing in the Invisible Man in the sky...

post-it · Post by **post-it** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:01 pm

dcdeveloperx wrote:i dont get one word u said post it

Subject: religon ( yes or no )
Arguement: what was written in the Bible.
My thoughts on the subject:

Post-It wrote:hmmm

Well this much we do know - it was a letter `written to
someone "at one time in the past" and no one can argue
that point ( it had to come from somewhere ) and was not
meant to be placed on the Mantle over some Fire Place
for warming the house and ignored - after all; how would
you feel if you wrote somebody a letter and all they did
was put it on a shelf and never read it!? (( if it were
me writing that letter; I'd be hurt if not upset! ))

However, by the way it was written we can tell that the
one who wrote it was not stupid!

We also know what the subject of the letter was but as to
who wrote it and why; that is unclear!

Scholars agree upon one basic understanding thou slightly
jaded, it was not written in anyones time frame
( a spicific date, time or day )
and as such must be give proper respect for the wisdom of
the writer(s)

WarpedElements · Post by **WarpedElements** » Sun Sep 21, 2003 12:03 pm

Yous gots my pity Lighting. Being sucha hata like that. And lyrs, your arguement of "you've just got a lot of to experience" etc. Does that mean if i meat enough gay people i'll suddenly accept it? So on that same logic, if i were to meat a whole buncha murders i'd accept murder as something that is to be accepted because it was their "life choice"?