The point to life: Do you realize...?

theocide · Post by **theocide** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:27 am

ahem shit didn't quite say enough.
it's all extremely simple undeniable logic.
if you don't breed you don't pass on genes if you do you do. i am the product of a species that was built because it loves to breed. those of the species who don't love to breed do not breed thus the that generation of the species in question is servived only by those who are the product of those who bred. DUH! it is my sole duty to breed and ultimately my greatest hunger is sated by breeding.

it just seems you made my argument more complicated than it was

MistyCaldwell · Post by **MistyCaldwell** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:29 am

theocide wrote: That is because any of our species that didn't want to have sex in the past million years or whatever just didn't have sex therefore didn't pass on their low-testosterone genes.

Also this. In species where there is an alpha male and female, the other males do not produce testosterone like the alphas. Even the alphas female produces a large amount of testosterone. This is true in humans as well. (females in positions of authority do produce a lot more testosterone than females in passive roles)

If that statement were true, then societies like wolves could not exist, because over time, they would have no omega and only alphas, driving themselves to extinction or solitary lives.

MistyCaldwell · Post by **MistyCaldwell** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:35 am

If you are only refering to humans, then it becomes more philisophical.

There are actually people who are born asexual (and depending on your beliefs homosexual) who nature has seemed to left out of the breeding pool. They would have been eliminated millenia ago by natural selection.

And the fact that not all of us obsess over sex. If it was that powerful of a force, suh as food or sleep, I don't think we could go any length of time by denying ourselves of it....don't any of you guys give the 'blue ball' arguement now...that is a myth and you know it

theocide · Post by **theocide** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:37 am

MistyCaldwell wrote:I was trying to let you know sex is not all about making babies

consider that for the most part we don't crave the feeling of having babies but having sex. evolution hasn't taken care of the problem of contraceptives... yet. then again it has b/c we do want kids. those who don't just suck and don't have them. so by having sex we are only virtually sating the hunger for breeding.

theocide · Post by **theocide** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:43 am

MistyCaldwell wrote:If you are only refering to humans, then it becomes more philisophical.

There are actually people who are born asexual (and depending on your beliefs homosexual) who nature has seemed to left out of the breeding pool. They would have been eliminated millenia ago by natural selection.

And the fact that not all of us obsess over sex. If it was that powerful of a force, suh as food or sleep, I don't think we could go any length of time by denying ourselves of it....don't any of you guys give the 'blue ball' arguement now...that is a myth and you know it

well obviously our main priority is to look out for #1. those who didn't do so did not servive long enough to breed

also having a strong will and a need to distinguishing yourself(ultimately this too is fueled by a need to fuck ppl) is what i blame for homosexuality

the fact that we live such long dull lives gives us much more time and energy and likelihood for breeding at some point thus for the past 10000 years even the most testosterone lacking individual had sex and bred at some point. so from this we get the so called asexual

theocide · Post by **theocide** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:49 am

MistyCaldwell wrote:
theocide wrote: That is because any of our species that didn't want to have sex in the past million years or whatever just didn't have sex therefore didn't pass on their low-testosterone genes.
Also this. In species where there is an alpha male and female, the other males do not produce testosterone like the alphas. Even the alphas female produces a large amount of testosterone. This is true in humans as well. (females in positions of authority do produce a lot more testosterone than females in passive roles)

If that statement were true, then societies like wolves could not exist, because over time, they would have no omega and only alphas, driving themselves to extinction or solitary lives.

ok the lower non alpha wolves produce less b/c it is unnecessary. having a will or a tendency if you will (due to evolution of course), the alpha female is only attracted to the alpha male. so if a ballsy little non alpha did happen to have a little extra testosterone the female would deny him neway. this is all b/c of natural sselection they didn't get this way over night there were of course plenty of bands that didn't have the proper breeding methods and died.

theocide · Post by **theocide** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 1:50 am

don't disappear now misty this thread is finally worth a shit

theocide · Post by **theocide** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:07 am

*whistles: ive seen trees of green, clouds of white, the bright blessed day, the dark sacred night, and i think to myself...*

theocide · Post by **theocide** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:13 am

*whistles Moody Blues - Isn't Life Strange*

waiting in vain i suppose

chaoticstormbringer · Post by **chaoticstormbringer** » Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:21 am

right... and all the peasants rejoice.
The darkness calls my name,
it beckons to my soul,
a spirit cries for freedom,
a spirit light cannot hold.
I yearn to see the moon,
Let the dark caress my face,
I shiver in sheer ecstacy,
when it is darkness that I truly taste.
Then dusk turns to dawn,
and the devil is to blame,
for night time is my daytime,
and vampire is my name.

a little poem I found -.- describes me more or less...[/list]

AnimeMusicVideos.org

The point to life: Do you realize...?

Re: The point to life: Do you realize...?

Re: The point to life: Do you realize...?

Re: The point to life: Do you realize...?