"I've been doing this for 19 years, wanna fight me?, fight these tears!"OmniStrata wrote:booyah, it's obvious you burned your own ass to make those scenesCastor Troy wrote:Burn the fucker at dawn!
I don't mind if someone steals any "normal" unaltered footage not counting when I change the scenes from my videos since people have done it before but if someone took any of my edited effects parts like my Spike vs. Piccolo scene from Bebop Z, then I'd raise hell.
question [video plagiarism]
- Castor Troy
- Ryan Molina, A.C.E
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2001 8:45 pm
- Status: Retired from AMVs
- Location: California
- Contact:
"You're ignoring everything, except what you want to hear.." - jbone
-
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2002 4:35 pm
- Contact:
sucks that these people dont take their fuckin time to do something of their own, even if it's crappy, at least it's yours, they rather take something that's already been done.....im just as pissed as he is cause i worked with Retro on that vid as well...and yes, I wanna burn him to the ground as well
- Dannywilson
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 5:36 am
- Location: In love with Dr. Girlfriend
- Dead_Pool
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 10:24 am
- Location: In The Mouth of Madness
- Arigatomina
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 3:04 am
- Contact:
I don't mind people stealing stolen footage - taking clips from someone's video. It's taking the idea or the story - that's what the creator has rights to, his idea. Even if the characters aren't his own, the idea using those is, and in any fandom you have to protect your ideas. Otherwise the best vids on this site would have been remade 6 times over - just stealing other people's great ideas (as well as the edits - which are individual contributions and not just footage alone).
The combination of footage to make an amv constitutes someone's idea of a vid - that's what's been stollen here, not just the original footage itself. And any edits he made to change that footage were stollen as well - meaning a reproduction of his work, his input into the anime.
This isn't just a matter of stealing stolen footage. But it seems most people already agree on that. ^_^; So I'm restating the obvious here.
The combination of footage to make an amv constitutes someone's idea of a vid - that's what's been stollen here, not just the original footage itself. And any edits he made to change that footage were stollen as well - meaning a reproduction of his work, his input into the anime.
This isn't just a matter of stealing stolen footage. But it seems most people already agree on that. ^_^; So I'm restating the obvious here.
- RETRO HELIX
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 9:48 am
- Contact:
well, it's not a thing of stealing stolen footage, my footage was original, i was the first one to use that movie, and i have the dvd, so i took clips from nobody; now that guy didnt take clips, he took the whole video and just put a new song instead of the one i had, my fault for uploading good quality wmvs, any clown with windows xp can rip them ¬_¬
-
- is
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 5:54 am
- Status: N͋̀͒̆ͣ͋ͤ̍ͮ͌ͭ̔̊͒ͧ̿
- Location: N????????????????
Um...RETRO HELIX wrote:well, it's not a thing of stealing stolen footage, my footage was original, i was the first one to use that movie, and i have the dvd, so i took clips from nobody
By your own admission, that footage isn't original -- it's from the DVD.
"Original footage" is hard to define, but it usually comes down to
(1) Stuff you did from scratch.
(2) Stuff you significantly manipulated -- an example would be re-drawing elements of the footage frame-by-frame.
Just being pedantic.
- RETRO HELIX
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 9:48 am
- Contact:
- Katsumi_AMVs
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2003 8:05 pm
- Location: Where I'm not supposed to be