No, it's the straw man. You were attacking a distorted position.staces wrote:Actually I think that it false dilemma, dicto simpliciter or the nautralistic fallacy. :wink:analysis: straw man argument.
A false dilemma would have been you presenting, say, a choice between "effectsy" and "good" vids, which you didn't. Dicto simpliciter would have been you making a sweeping generalization: "all effectsy vids cannot be good". Naturalistic fallacy would be appropriate had you said or implied something like "More and more people are starting to dislike effectsy videos, therefore they are not good".