Why do people only notice the BAD points of your video?

Pie Row Maniac · Post by **Pie Row Maniac** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 2:41 am

I goto work and come back a mere few hours laters to find four more pages have been filled up.

This is quite utterly amazing, in such a very very bad way.

Tab. · Post by **Tab.** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 2:46 am

So aren't you going to enlighten us on what effect you had on Honda?

Your beliefs really are quite interesting, especially if anyone is supposed to take this whole superman thing seriously. So far I'm just tossin out a bunch of pieces of different philosophies I've read up on, and then interpreting your responses through them and through your own proposed philosophy. That makes it interesting.. seeing where the pieces fall and happen to fit together.

inanitydishamen · Post by **inanitydishamen** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 3:20 am

You people are making my Existentialist brain throb.

stop with the spirit bullshit.

None of that stuff is real.

go suck off a pitbull.

jonmartensen · Post by **jonmartensen** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 3:24 am

Good thing I'm a panthiest nominalist. SUCK ON THAT!

Pie Row Maniac · Post by **Pie Row Maniac** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 6:25 am

jonmartensen wrote:Good thing I'm a panthiest nominalist.

Oh yeah!? Well.... *runs*

downwithpants · Post by **downwithpants** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 11:38 am

proposition: time = artistic quality

i took an extra long time on the toilet yesterday because i ate something that gave me indigestion. by that logic, if i were to call what came out as art, it would be better quality than what usually comes out.

fyrtenheimer · Post by **fyrtenheimer** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 11:42 am

downwithpants wrote:proposition: time = artistic quality

i took an extra long time on the toilet yesterday because i ate something that gave me indigestion. by that logic, if i were to call what came out as art, it would be better quality than what usually comes out.

and that's crap

jonmartensen · Post by **jonmartensen** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:38 pm

downwithpants wrote:proposition: time = artistic quality

i took an extra long time on the toilet yesterday because i ate something that gave me indigestion. by that logic, if i were to call what came out as art, it would be better quality than what usually comes out.

wait, what?

Onideus_Mad_Hatter · Post by **Onideus_Mad_Hatter** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 1:23 pm

Tab. wrote:So aren't you going to enlighten us on what effect you had on Honda?

I thought that I already had?

Your beliefs really are quite interesting,

Pffft, who said they were mine? I have no beliefs, only things that I am aware of.

especially if anyone is supposed to take this whole superman thing seriously.

*shrugs*

To be perfectly honest whether you or anyone else does...doesn't really matter to me. The only true freedom anyone really has is to believe in what they want.

So far I'm just tossin out a bunch of pieces of different philosophies I've read up on, and then interpreting your responses through them and through your own proposed philosophy.

I know what you're trying to do. I mean what you REALLY want to do. You've read a whole lot of different philosophies and studies quite a few religions and you're trying to find out where my "ideas" were derived from. To put it simply, you're attempting to find fault within me. You want to prove to yourself that I just ripped off the "idea" from something else, or derived them from something else...of course on the flip side there's also a part of you that WANTS to believe that my "ideas" are wholly original...and perhaps they are. ^_^

That makes it interesting.. seeing where the pieces fall and happen to fit together.

Ahhh, the human attempt at trying to relate religious and philosophical beliefs of the world...he, he, he...just remember one thing Tab, like I said, it's all about the harvesting of souls. Different "things" have different needs and they brand their cattle in different ways. `, )

Savia · Post by **Savia** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 1:38 pm

Onideus_Mad_Hatter wrote:I know what you're trying to do. I mean what you REALLY want to do. You've read a whole lot of different philosophies and studies quite a few religions and you're trying to find out where my "ideas" were derived from. To put it simply, you're attempting to find fault within me. You want to prove to yourself that I just ripped off the "idea" from something else, or derived them from something else...of course on the flip side there's also a part of you that WANTS to believe that my "ideas" are wholly original...and perhaps they are. ^_^

Why does deriving one's ideas from somewhere indicate flaws and/or faults in one? I think you're perhaps approaching an innocent inquiry as more of a subtle jab at you than is strictly necessary.

To clarify, as mentioned in my previous post (which I would be interested to hear your reactions to, assuming you read it), I seek a discussion here, not an argument. Just because I currently have different beliefs to you does not necessarily mean that I am only out to hammer mine into you; arriving at a superior hybrid via discussion is a lot more useful to both parties.

I feel that you are likely to take this post and somehow turn aside the intention of goodwill behind it, but I'd like to believe that you are willing and capable of being reasonable and not taking your own words and interpretation of other's as gospel truth. Please don't prove me wrong.