AMV Editing: A Postmodernist art movement?
- Beowulf
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 9:41 pm
- Location: in the art house
- Contact:
- AMV_4000
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2002 6:29 am
- Location: USA
- Contact:
- guy07
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 1:28 pm
- Status: Back in beard.
- Location: T.O.
I'm sure many of u consider just 'doodeling',like making fan art, just a hobby the same way you consider making amvs a hobby. But drawing is a art, isn't it? does that make amv's a art? How the fuck should i know? i just posted because i was bored, this topic is WAY to advanced for me, i don't even understand half of it. Come to think of it, i don't really care if amvs are art or not, i like them either way. 'Nuf said.
- Warheart
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 11:58 am
- Status: Immersed
- Location: In Fiction
- Contact:
Ok the anwser is simple. AMVs are postmodern since they don't necessaryly create something new they're just using recompiled music and animefootage. And the word postmodern defines the re-use of elements that were already created and/or used in the past time. So yep, amvs are a postmodern artform but it's not a movement since no one actually thinks about doing this because it is postmodern. /thread closed.
- JudgeHolden
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:49 am
- Status: Looking at you through your window!
- Location: The great white north (Minneapolis)
Re: AMV Editing: A Postmodernist art movement?
downwithpants has never spoken truer words.downwithpants wrote:welcome to the org.iamfanboy wrote:We are a step ahead of the mainstream postmodern artists, because we're creating art for the sake of the art. We've avoided the masturbatory tendancies of postmodernism because we ARE creating for an audience, while avoiding the pitfalls of art-whoredom because there is no profit involved; we can walk the fine line between self-love and other-love that true art requires.
you couldn't be farther from the truth.
when vcas come, you will see why.
- wurpess
- rabid fangirl
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 11:44 pm
- Status: BLAAAARGH!!!!! -_-
- Location: The happy place in my head
because we're bored?Tash wrote:Why is everyone talking to fanboy!
He is so stupid!
Like in life, you have the book smart and the street smart. The same goes in art. You have the "book smart" ones that study to create and appreciate art. They are generally the ones that have to analyze everything and attempt to give meaning and justification to everything. Then there are the "street smart" ones. Those who create and appreciate souly on instinct. Letting the art take over and leaving reason far behind. Then laugh at the "intellectuals" as they attempt to give hidden meanings to art that either isn't there or is way off because they're thinking with their mind not their heart. Or is something they would never guess because they're emoting some tiny facet of their subconscious. Yes, some art sends a clear message and is meant to be analyzed. Other art is just meant to be enjoyed. Same goes for AMVs. You can sit there and analyze them til the cows come home and wonder what they were trying to convey and why they do amvs, and what exactly amvs are in relation to art. Or you can just sit back and enjoy them. I think its good for AMVs to have some kind of meaning, but it doesn't have to be anything deep and profound. It could just be a representation of the maker's emotions or subconscious at the moment. The reason? Because we can.
- azulmagia
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 12:27 am
- Location: Canada
That's true and Roy Lichtenstein even more so. His entire gig depended on the the idea that he was a "real" artist, while the people who drew the comic books that he ripped off weren't.Beowulf wrote:I haven't read one word of thise thread but Andy Warhol is a fucking no talent hack and represents pretty much ALL THINGS WRONG with art and artists.
Ganeshaseal | Gaia Online |The Shoujo-Ai Heavens is gone again!
My First AMV: Ai Tenshi Ain't Goin Out Like That
My First AMV: Ai Tenshi Ain't Goin Out Like That
- Warpwind
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 4:19 am
- Location: middle of the desert
- Contact:
Linked for funazulmagia wrote:That's true and Roy Lichtenstein even more so. His entire gig depended on the the idea that he was a "real" artist, while the people who drew the comic books that he ripped off weren't.Beowulf wrote:I haven't read one word of thise thread but Andy Warhol is a fucking no talent hack and represents pretty much ALL THINGS WRONG with art and artists.
http://davidbarsalou.homestead.com/LICH ... OJECT.html
- Otohiko
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:32 pm
Haha, strange how the actual sources look better.Warpwind wrote: Linked for fun
http://davidbarsalou.homestead.com/LICH ... OJECT.html
He also sucked at drawing airplanes
The Birds are using humanity in order to throw something terrifying at this green pig. And then what happens to us all later, that’s simply not important to them…