I'm new.... Welcome me.

Savia · Post by **Savia** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:59 pm

The Eva Monkey wrote:This place is retardedly nitpicky with sigs... you know what, forum structure loads first, then images which enter cache, it makes no difference in the greater scheme of things what size a person's sig is if its self hosted. I use 56k alot to view forums, and I've never groaned at people's sigs. REAL sigs are art, and I find it disrespectful to delete them without warning. I don't have the time to edit my signature for every fucking forum I go to.

Although I see your point, does every forum you go to have over 120,000 registered users? There's a lot of potential for using up space intended for AMVs there

The Eva Monkey · Post by **The Eva Monkey** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 8:19 pm

Savia wrote:
The Eva Monkey wrote:This place is retardedly nitpicky with sigs... you know what, forum structure loads first, then images which enter cache, it makes no difference in the greater scheme of things what size a person's sig is if its self hosted. I use 56k alot to view forums, and I've never groaned at people's sigs. REAL sigs are art, and I find it disrespectful to delete them without warning. I don't have the time to edit my signature for every fucking forum I go to.
Although I see your point, does every forum you go to have over 120,000 registered users? There's a lot of potential for using up space intended for AMVs there

1) the size of my sig does not affect bandwith for AMVs, it affects my bandwith.
2) of the users here, the vast majority of them are 0 posters, and even fewer still are active posters. The fact that I simply posted several times has most likely put me into the upper percentile. I'd look further into the statistics, but this forum has conveniently removed the ability to sort by posts.

So.... essentially I fail to see your point.

Dvirus101 · Post by **Dvirus101** » Mon Oct 20, 2003 8:40 pm

madmag9999 wrote:nice sig The Eva Monkey see what happens if u disobay the mods

darn you madmag! I was going to use that nono.gif pic about his sig....

stealing my posts

Oh yes, the matter at hand. Come thee well to the org... of DOOM! Muahaha! You'll never make it out of here alive! Or in one piece.... Okay so you will.... Now go piss on someone elses parade <-- Haha I'm stealing other people's things.
And before anyone else tells you.... 1337 15 |=0|2 73|-| 14/\/\3|25... And change that sig! hehe, just riding the bandwagon of "rule-sayers"...

Savia · Post by **Savia** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 4:49 am

The Eva Monkey wrote:
Savia wrote:
The Eva Monkey wrote:This place is retardedly nitpicky with sigs... you know what, forum structure loads first, then images which enter cache, it makes no difference in the greater scheme of things what size a person's sig is if its self hosted. I use 56k alot to view forums, and I've never groaned at people's sigs. REAL sigs are art, and I find it disrespectful to delete them without warning. I don't have the time to edit my signature for every fucking forum I go to.
Although I see your point, does every forum you go to have over 120,000 registered users? There's a lot of potential for using up space intended for AMVs there
1) the size of my sig does not affect bandwith for AMVs, it affects my bandwith.
2) of the users here, the vast majority of them are 0 posters, and even fewer still are active posters. The fact that I simply posted several times has most likely put me into the upper percentile. I'd look further into the statistics, but this forum has conveniently removed the ability to sort by posts.

So.... essentially I fail to see your point.

Just putting across the common argument. No offense intended.

Oh, and: here's a post count sorted memberlist.

The Eva Monkey · Post by **The Eva Monkey** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:02 am

So, according to my calculations, me posting 14 times has put me into the uper 1% of posters. Wow.... horray for statistics. The shear volume of zero posters is staggering.... 118071.

Flint the Dwarf · Post by **Flint the Dwarf** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 10:10 am

Yeah but if you added up all the posts and divided that by the total number of members... everyone would have some posts.

The Eva Monkey · Post by **The Eva Monkey** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 12:01 pm

flint_the_dwarf wrote:Yeah but if you added up all the posts and divided that by the total number of members... everyone would have some posts.

Each person would have 2.1 posts.... so?

Flint the Dwarf · Post by **Flint the Dwarf** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 12:03 pm

OMFG SHUT UP

jonmartensen · Post by **jonmartensen** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:25 pm

-4568 members have made at least one post.
-Posters with 14 posts reside in the range of poster #1101 and #1147 when ranked according to total post count. This would place a poster with 14 posts in the upper 25% of users who post.
-A person with 14 posts comprises 0.01% of all posts made.
-The number 1 poster (with 4725 posts) comprises 1.81% of all posts made.
-The top ten posters have posted 15.14% of all material on this board.
-Of those top ten, four accounts are currently inactive, and have been for a while.
-If you calculate by membership when regarding posting activity, anyone who has made at least one post is in the top 4% of posters, and anyone with at least 5 posts is in the top 1% of posters.

What does this tell you?....I have too much time between my economics class and my physics lab :\

Flint the Dwarf · Post by **Flint the Dwarf** » Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:57 pm

jonmartensen wrote:-Of those top ten, four accounts are currently inactive, and have been for a while.

Three. CaT isn't really inactive...