You probably need two heads when looking at this AMV [YOKO]
Forum rules
Please observe the following unique rules for this forum:
Please observe the following unique rules for this forum:
- Please limit your new threads (not replies) to one per week. If you have several new videos to announce, create one thread for all the videos. (Note: if you forget one you can edit your post!)
- Offsite links are allowed, but you are required to have a catalog entry for that video as well. Threads announcing videos that do not contain a catalog entry will be moved to the Awaiting Catalog Entry sub-forum and will be deleted in 2 weeks if an entry is not created.
- When posting announcements, it is recommended that you include links to the catalog entries (using the video ID) in your post.
- Videos that do not contain anime are allowed to be announced in the Other Videos section and are not required to have catalog entries.
- dazedash
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:31 pm
- Location: WVU
After Vindichi - Trauer, no more Pale Cocoon video plz.
/me don't gonna take it -.-
Even if the AMV, which I mentioned here didn't win any contests, it's still my favorite among PaleC's vid. I don't know why but it's for sure %)
I understand that is kind of hard to make AMV from such a small OVA… I think that this video of yours kinda interesting but it isn’t in the way I would like to see it. If you did presentation in “text” you should’ve been construct the video in the way that will completely improve your presentation in “text”. I see even people that speak your language left a little bit confused with the video. So there you have it.
It’s just my thoughts though -^^-
/me don't gonna take it -.-
Even if the AMV, which I mentioned here didn't win any contests, it's still my favorite among PaleC's vid. I don't know why but it's for sure %)
I understand that is kind of hard to make AMV from such a small OVA… I think that this video of yours kinda interesting but it isn’t in the way I would like to see it. If you did presentation in “text” you should’ve been construct the video in the way that will completely improve your presentation in “text”. I see even people that speak your language left a little bit confused with the video. So there you have it.
It’s just my thoughts though -^^-
- CrackTheSky
- has trust issues
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 11:01 pm
- Status: Maybe editing?
- Location: Chicago
- Niotex
- The Phantom Canine
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2003 1:54 pm
- Status: Simply Insane
- Location: Netherlands
- Reigna
- is actually a penguin in boots
- Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 7:23 pm
- Location: WI
- Contact:
-
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:07 pm
-
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:21 am
1. Very nice AMV, I liked it a lot.
2. I think the text is unnecessary. Making it "67"
instead of "36" would have been more daring.
3. It always seems to me that long explanations
only serve for AMV editors to show how clever they
are. An AMV either stands on its own or it doesn't.
4. The mood, storyline and execution remind me a lot
of a commercial that a Toronto newspaper made a few years ago:
http://reimeika.ca/marco/data/sweetmarie.zip
5. I'm glad people are liking this video, I much more enjoy
this slower style of editing than the barrage of ADD-oriented
stuff that usually gets posted.
2. I think the text is unnecessary. Making it "67"
instead of "36" would have been more daring.
3. It always seems to me that long explanations
only serve for AMV editors to show how clever they
are. An AMV either stands on its own or it doesn't.
4. The mood, storyline and execution remind me a lot
of a commercial that a Toronto newspaper made a few years ago:
http://reimeika.ca/marco/data/sweetmarie.zip
5. I'm glad people are liking this video, I much more enjoy
this slower style of editing than the barrage of ADD-oriented
stuff that usually gets posted.
- Douggie
- CHEESECAKE!
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 5:14 am
- Contact:
Bringing this topic back up again from the third page.. I know it's a bit shameful, but I haven't replied yet and owed the people who downloaded it and commented on it a thanks, so everybody... thank you very much for taking the time to check it out and to respond! I really appriciate it.
Here are some replies:
As for the masking, I've changed a few parts, so if you downloaded it, you see that it looks better. Thanks for the advice! (seems I didn't use feather at all at 2 of the parts - don't know how that happened!).
Thanks for showing the link! I like some of tricks used for the two screens, I would've done more stuff too if I had better material. I like the zoom-in part in the video. I actually had no idea commercials could be so long!
I don't know if people actually like this video - I'm bordering on a 3.3 average... ADD-oriented stuff...lol, that's a good description! It seems that people have short attention span nowadays - like only 1/2 a second! But seriously, stuff that goes that fast, I just can't see what happens!
Thanks to reigna, Lick, exphy, JCD, Warheart, Esrhan, CrackTheSky and all the other people I've forgotten for their comments too!
On a sidenote, some of the QCs I've gotten were [sarcasm]really nice[/sarcasm], but good to see what people think of it. So I just found out how it works here: it seems that QCs are the place for the more negative comments - I just wish the one who said that the I should learn to encode properly in h.264 would back his comment up properly - I mean, I thought it wasn't that bad, right?
Here are some replies:
Thanks for the comments Greggus! Could you elaborate more on a climatic ending? I always like endings that make you think, because those ending make you want to see the movie/AMV/etc. again, but you're right, you always need to work to a certain climax. It's just too bad - as an AMV editor you're always dependent on the material...Greggus1 wrote:Nobody's replied here yet? What's wrong with you people?
Anyway, I'm on a Mac, but had no problem here. I'm really amazed by the ambition and effort you put into your AMV's, although both feel like they're missing a more climactic ending. I understand your trade is subtlety and hidden layers, but sometimes, some raw power will bring out the emotion a hundred metaphors never could.
We've really seen the AMV community expand it's musical references lately, and I'm loving the recent wave of softer vids coming out. You're one of the frontrunners, without a doubt
Do you have a link? I'm quite interested in that music video, or do you mean the one shumira_chan means?autraya wrote:This reminds me a bit of the video clip to the goo goo dolls sliding doors, they keep moving around and missing each other.
To be honest, when I heard that you were in the jury, I thought you were a specialFX-whore and that I would made it as one of the last! Fortunately, I couldn't be any gladder with you in the jury! I knew a lot of people wouldn't like it, but hey, I'm not the type of person to do stuff that's already done 1000x. So people might find it to be "too artistic" - I don't find that a reason: I could say the same about videos, that they're "too non-artistic". Do you have any more of the bad reactions of the audience? I'd love to hear them!Niotex wrote:Finally it was about damn time.
Dispite some bad reactions I got off con/board, on letting this get first price at Abunai. I really like this video. The main concern that people had was that "it was TOO" something they couldn't explain. I reply 'd "artistic for your taste?" and they just looked at me confused or gave me wierd smiley's.
As for the masking, I've changed a few parts, so if you downloaded it, you see that it looks better. Thanks for the advice! (seems I didn't use feather at all at 2 of the parts - don't know how that happened!).
Thanks for your comments, but I don't agree, the explanatory page is to explain the video, not to tell the video. It's an analysis, kinda like books or even discussions about storylines of movies, games or whatever you have. The experience of a video is a whole different thing and has to portray a feeling, which an analysis can't do (kinda like scientific article can talk about anger, but can never really portray the feeling like a movie does with anger).dazedash wrote:I understand that is kind of hard to make AMV from such a small OVA… I think that this video of yours kinda interesting but it isn’t in the way I would like to see it. If you did presentation in “text” you should’ve been construct the video in the way that will completely improve your presentation in “text”. I see even people that speak your language left a little bit confused with the video. So there you have it.
The explanations are a good way for me think about what I've really done in a video. I believe that as an editor you have to justify every cut you do, every effect you put in, even if you do things on improvisation, on feeling (which is a lot actually) - EVENTUALLY you have to know why you've done things at that moment and whether it works or not. So it's a good exercise for myself. I'm also interested whether people have the same vision and feeling I have about the AMV, even if it's just the same direction - so I know whether I failed in portraying the things I'd like to. Sometimes the stuff I do might be "too deep", but I always wondered where the border lies - I mean, sometimes you need a kick into the right direction to understand stuff or just know there's more to it than just the surface. I actually never saw long explanations of AMV's which explains scenes in detail- if you have some links then I would really love to see them (just to see how other editors think!).shumira-chan wrote:3. It always seems to me that long explanations
only serve for AMV editors to show how clever they
are. An AMV either stands on its own or it doesn't.
4. The mood, storyline and execution remind me a lot
of a commercial that a Toronto newspaper made a few years ago:
http://reimeika.ca/marco/data/sweetmarie.zip
5. I'm glad people are liking this video, I much more enjoy
this slower style of editing than the barrage of ADD-oriented
stuff that usually gets posted.
Thanks for showing the link! I like some of tricks used for the two screens, I would've done more stuff too if I had better material. I like the zoom-in part in the video. I actually had no idea commercials could be so long!
I don't know if people actually like this video - I'm bordering on a 3.3 average... ADD-oriented stuff...lol, that's a good description! It seems that people have short attention span nowadays - like only 1/2 a second! But seriously, stuff that goes that fast, I just can't see what happens!
Thanks to reigna, Lick, exphy, JCD, Warheart, Esrhan, CrackTheSky and all the other people I've forgotten for their comments too!
On a sidenote, some of the QCs I've gotten were [sarcasm]really nice[/sarcasm], but good to see what people think of it. So I just found out how it works here: it seems that QCs are the place for the more negative comments - I just wish the one who said that the I should learn to encode properly in h.264 would back his comment up properly - I mean, I thought it wasn't that bad, right?