Flesh Field Strain MEP

Scott Green · Post by **Scott Green** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:44 pm

ArashinomeAMV wrote:
Ryko89 wrote:I think I will have a cute beta done by this sunday. Im making love to the timeline right now. Done processing my footage
Cute isn't what we aim for |:

See wut I did thar? O:

shut up, bitch

Kevmaster · Post by **Kevmaster** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:44 pm

Scott Green wrote:
ArashinomeAMV wrote:
Ryko89 wrote:I think I will have a cute beta done by this sunday. Im making love to the timeline right now. Done processing my footage
Cute isn't what we aim for |:

See wut I did thar? O:
shut up, bitch

yeah shut up with this faggotry

EvaFan · Post by **EvaFan** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:40 pm

You know.. I really want to join this but everytime I read the:

Techs & Rules etc... wrote: - Aspect Ratio: 640x480 (letterbox your 16:9 source). You can send me the max quality version (HD), I'll letterbox and resize it, or you can make it by your way.
- Final version must be compressed in Huffyuv or Lagarith.
- 24 fps
- De-interlaced footage (progressive)
- DVD or HD source
- You can choose until 2 Tracks if you really love Flesh Field
- Videogames are allowed.
- If you think that you can do better tracks than the actual editors, then prove it.
- If your video sux, you're out.

The 24fps bothers me alot. I read that your considering 29.97. I'm begging you to change it to ntsc...

There is one other thing that bothers me and that’s the 640x480 letterboxed sources... It bothers me cause your asking for industrial animes (IE CGI animated stuff, basically top of the line crap). This kind of "Top of the line" crap is mostly widescreen nowadays anyways. It would make more sense to make the MEP widescreen.

If your absolutely hellbent on using 4:3 as the final render then I can only suggest you get a 4:3AR(letterboxed) version and a 16:9AR version from all the people with widescreen tracks so you can make a 4:3 version of the MEP with letterboxed widescreen tracks and a 16:9 version of the MEP with letterboxed 4:3 tracks.

Why do I say this? Cause I fully regret it on my MEP(when I was new and not very informed) and I don't want to see it happen to an MEP I want to join

... Most monitors are 16:9 nowadays anyways and watching this MEP on an HDTV in the future would be awesome.

It's not hard at all really anyways... The 4:3 tracks are only needed at 640x480... The widscreen tracks you need a 640x480(letterboxed) version and a 848x480(Mod16 16:9 close as your gonna get). The 4:3 tracks will fit right in the widescreen version of the MEP without even having to change their size in premiere/vegas/whatever.

K so... now that all that's been said... If you decide to go with 29.97 fps, I'm interested in Track 12 with .hack GU Trilogy Movie and believe me I'm willing to fight for it

.

Should have plenty of time to wrap other stuff going on up since this mep doesn't have a specific deadline yet and your not in a hurry.

PS. Thx for introducing me to fleshfield regardless

.

Goketsu · Post by **Goketsu** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:01 am

so has anyone else made any more progress

Shinnie04 · Post by **Shinnie04** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:32 am

Goketsu wrote:so has anyone else made any more progress

Not yet ><. Stupid school projects and other AMV projects are getting in the way

OnyX DragoN · Post by **OnyX DragoN** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:30 pm

The point of having it at 24 frames per second is because that is IVTC which is a much better interlacing method and a LOT of people don't know how to make 29.97 footage look good. That being said, the 4:3 aspect ratio is to accommodate the video game footage which is not widescreen (as in mine and zet's tracks which is fatal frame, 4:3) There is a reason why undeadborn picked what he did, and I'm sure it would be a horrible loss if you didn't want to join the project, but I think he would get over it. Also, framerate change in the middle of a project is B A D. So I really think that is out of the question anyways. Cheers

dreamawake · Post by **dreamawake** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:28 pm

OnyX DragoN wrote:The point of having it at 24 frames per second is because that is IVTC which is a much better interlacing method and a LOT of people don't know how to make 29.97 footage look good. That being said, the 4:3 aspect ratio is to accommodate the video game footage which is not widescreen (as in mine and zet's tracks which is fatal frame, 4:3) There is a reason why undeadborn picked what he did, and I'm sure it would be a horrible loss if you didn't want to join the project, but I think he would get over it. Also, framerate change in the middle of a project is B A D. So I really think that is out of the question anyways. Cheers

Wut he said \:

Kristyrat · Post by **Kristyrat** » Sun Jul 20, 2008 9:57 pm

ArashinomeAMV wrote:
OnyX DragoN wrote:The point of having it at 24 frames per second is because that is IVTC which is a much better interlacing method and a LOT of people don't know how to make 29.97 footage look good. That being said, the 4:3 aspect ratio is to accommodate the video game footage which is not widescreen (as in mine and zet's tracks which is fatal frame, 4:3) There is a reason why undeadborn picked what he did, and I'm sure it would be a horrible loss if you didn't want to join the project, but I think he would get over it. Also, framerate change in the middle of a project is B A D. So I really think that is out of the question anyways. Cheers
Wut he said \:

And the point of having 29.97 fps is to allow tighter sync and cleaner cuts.

They're not both without advantages.

EvaFan · Post by **EvaFan** » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:07 am

ah well, I tried... GL with the project.

Still though thx for introducing me to em, prolly just gonna solo somethin.

OnyX DragoN · Post by **OnyX DragoN** » Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:42 am

Kristyrat wrote:
ArashinomeAMV wrote:
OnyX DragoN wrote:The point of having it at 24 frames per second is because that is IVTC which is a much better interlacing method and a LOT of people don't know how to make 29.97 footage look good. That being said, the 4:3 aspect ratio is to accommodate the video game footage which is not widescreen (as in mine and zet's tracks which is fatal frame, 4:3) There is a reason why undeadborn picked what he did, and I'm sure it would be a horrible loss if you didn't want to join the project, but I think he would get over it. Also, framerate change in the middle of a project is B A D. So I really think that is out of the question anyways. Cheers
Wut he said \:
And the point of having 29.97 fps is to allow tighter sync and cleaner cuts.

They're not both without advantages.

Now now, don't get me wrong, I actually prefer 29.97. However, changing in the middle of a project is foolish. That was the major point I was going for. Thanks for pointing it out though kristyrat