I don't quite understand all of this whole, 'getting upset at people for things that are beyond anyone's control,' thing. Some AMV directors just don't want to make videos for the contest or can't make the deadline, and that's fine. The only reason I really even go to Otakon anymore is to SEE the AMV "screenings" or "contest," or whatever you want to call it. It's something to talk about. It's an event. Some vidoes you'll only ever see once. And that's unique.hackerzc wrote:But going back to the number of entries, having fewer this year is a two edged sword. On one hand there are less entries than usual (though still more than enough for the contest). On the other hand having fewer entries is what's making it possible to switch over to DVD for prescreening and overflows this year (a decision was handed down that all con programming this year would be DVD based). Also, those entering the contest have the best chances of making it to the finals than they've had in years (I know that sounds like a spin, because it is... but it's a good thing for creators).
With all of this crazy, "the internet," most of the anime that you can see at Otakon, you can download months ahead of time. It's not like, "next year there won't be an AMV contest at Otakon," or anything. Everybody knows when Otakon is going to be held. It's not a secret. The AMV contest comes with it. So, deadlines aren't a valid excuse in this case. Any video that you work on between August and May can be submitted to Otakon, as long as you don't (gasp) upload it somewhere first.
I for one, am always highly anticipating and excited about the AMV contest at Otakon. And if I could, I'd shake the hand of and thank every individual who submits videos to the contest, and every person who helps make the screening possible. It's definately one of the highlights of my year.
I have a suggestion about the number of entries, if there aren't enough entries to have a real "voting" process to make it into the contest, and it's more of a "cut out 3 of the very worst videos" just to make it exactly a 2 hour contest. Or maybe having fewer entries submitted will work out better this year--I don't know. But if there aren't enough, try a "We have just enough, but we could use more entries, so the next 10, (20, or however many more you need) people to get back to me, by e-mail, have 1 month to get a video to me." This way, people who complain about the deadline still have a shot to get in, and the people who made it in have an actual contest, instead of a showing of "what made it in on time."
That was much longer than I had meant for it to be. But I felt like saying something about it. - ReligionX