That was going to be the title for my next AMV!VicBond007 wrote:I'll take 2 hours of good Naruto videos over 4 hours of drawn-out pretentious crap.
Oh well, off to Right Stuff to buy some Naruto...
That was going to be the title for my next AMV!VicBond007 wrote:I'll take 2 hours of good Naruto videos over 4 hours of drawn-out pretentious crap.
Funny you should say that. My wife thinks my avatar makes me look like "Senator Brad." Maybe you have something there.VicBond007 wrote:If it takes you longer than 6 minutes to get your point across, then you're better suited for a job in Congress, not video editing.
I never thought that you were impugning my video, nor would I ever have expected an exception. I always accept contest rules. I simply feel that having such a short time limit deprives the Otakon audience of enjoying the occasional long-form video that actually happens to be good. To put it in a mathematical perspective, you're saying it's better for an audience to not be shown an amazing 7:00 minute video, just so they can see two 3:30 videos that may not be as good. You're choosing quantity over quality.VicBond007 wrote:And no, I'm not jabbing at Signal to Noise. It's a great video. I'm just saying that if I make an exception for one video, it applies to everything else.
I also think the "Survivor" analogy is irrelevant. You're comparing an AMV creator to someone who edits for a living. The editors of "Survivor" have producers, directors, and a network to answer to. Indeed, trimming the footage to fit within the constraints of a broadcast hour is in their job description. AMV creators are trying to realize their own personal vision, and answer only to themselves.VicBond007 wrote:Ever watch Survivor on TV? They'll take a week's worth of multi-cam footage and knock it down to 41 minutes. That doesn't mean that there wasn't more worth showing, that just means that the editor had time constraints and had to make decisions as to what made it into the final product.
/dies...................... I know where you sleep at night :3 . I don't think (I hope and pray) that it will be TOO bad though. We're remembering to put breaks in the middle of screening catagories this year aren't we? >.<VicBond007 wrote: I will look into experimenting with relaxing the time limit for next year. Suck it, pre-screeners
The forms this year don't have the studio name on them, but if the creator put their studio name in the video itself, I am not blacking it out, nor holding it against them.Scintilla wrote:And speaking of pre-screeners, will the prescreenings be blind this year (in the interest of greater fairness)?
Any resolution is fine.Gamergirl89 wrote:Another quick question, does video size matter? 'Cause I rendered my video out at 1280x720. Is that going to be a problem?