I know. It's the same thing Godix said earlier. Four guys do all the flaming on the site so we say "it's the guys who do all the flaming." It doesn't matter if it's the same four guys doing it. The fact is, the ones doing it are guys. Even if there were only one girl doing everything I've mentioned, I'd still say there was more "female action" at work than male. If you want to say all the active girls are journal junkies and so they should all be counted as one person (or one mini organization), okay. That doesn't change the fact that they're girls, they're doing everything, and compared to the guys, that group of girls is contributing a lot more.JaddziaDax wrote:im thinking of "the active girls" as a group and not just the #1 spot... see where im coming from?
I wasn't trying to take credit away from that group, but there are some very active females outside it. It's easier to include all the active females on the org if I make sweeping statements about females here in general. That group has guys who contribute as much as the girls, anyway, so if I made a rant just about them it wouldn't fit the whole "female takeover" theme.
And myeck, sorry for the gender confusion. But it's okay! Cause I never considered journals to begin with. And having a guy be the most active journal poster just nixed what you said about the JJ girls ruling that part of the forum. I think DJ's been posting more often than most of the female JJs recently, anway. ;p