Albert Einstein wrote:I do not think that it is necessarily the case that science and religion are natural opposites. In fact, I think that there is a very close connection between the two. Further, I think that science without religion is lame and, conversely, that religion without science is blind. Both are important and should work hand-in-hand.
Guess I had to throw my hat back in before breakfast. I'll answer quotes with quotes if I can think of them.
Requiett wrote:So if faith offers a little haven for the miserable masses to continue with their daily lives, why not let them have it?
Surely you aren't advocating Nietzsche's own arguement AGAINST religion as an arguement FOR religion? "Religion is the opiate of the masses" is exactly why so much trouble happens with these Rwars. And I think we are arguing dangerously in another direction. The topic for this is "Science and Religion" and we are also arguing science vs. faith in God or some higher power. Faith and religion go hand in hand but there are many faithful people who lack a clear religion (it's also argueable that there are many religious people with a distinct lack of faith).
Depending on your semantics moral relativism is just as much a religion as Catholocism, with it's diehard advocates as well as it's fringe elements, spin-off cults, and general no real opinion population who show up for the heck of it.
Kalium wrote:Read your Bible recently? It's not exactly nice to the fairer sex, to say the least.
It's also not particularly tolerant of unbelievers, yet I haven't picked up any stones. Unfortunately, I am pretty sure I've sinned a bit in my day, so I don't get to cast them. Yet there are female role models in the Torah/Bible/maybe even the Qu'ran(haven't read it to know, but I know they hold the tenets of the Bible and the Torah). Esther? Ruth? Deborah? Racheal? Lydia? Sarah? Dinah? I could go on but I'd actually go have to get my Bible.
I'm gonna double-post...