Science and Faith

Topics not related to Anime Music Videos
Post Reply
User avatar
Kalium
Sir Bugsalot
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: Plymouth, Michigan
Org Profile

Post by Kalium » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:18 pm

Shazzy wrote:Fair enough. Many religious people feel the same way about atheists, though. They're not trying to nuke the Gentiles, but they think an atheistic viewpoint is less than true.
Acutally, most religious types seem to think atheists are evil incarnate.

Which is kinda funny, really, but they wouldn't get it.

User avatar
requiett
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Alaska
Org Profile

Post by requiett » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:24 pm

Alright, this topic is a little too Nietzsche for me. Clearly "God is dead" just automatically has to be applied where reason is concerned around here. It's ironically the most unreasonable assumption I've ever dealt with.

User avatar
badmartialarts
Bad Martial Artist
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:31 am
Location: In ur Kitchen Stadium, eatin ur peppurz
Org Profile

Post by badmartialarts » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:26 pm

Albert Einstein wrote:I do not think that it is necessarily the case that science and religion are natural opposites. In fact, I think that there is a very close connection between the two. Further, I think that science without religion is lame and, conversely, that religion without science is blind. Both are important and should work hand-in-hand.
Guess I had to throw my hat back in before breakfast. I'll answer quotes with quotes if I can think of them.
Requiett wrote:So if faith offers a little haven for the miserable masses to continue with their daily lives, why not let them have it?
Surely you aren't advocating Nietzsche's own arguement AGAINST religion as an arguement FOR religion? "Religion is the opiate of the masses" is exactly why so much trouble happens with these Rwars. And I think we are arguing dangerously in another direction. The topic for this is "Science and Religion" and we are also arguing science vs. faith in God or some higher power. Faith and religion go hand in hand but there are many faithful people who lack a clear religion (it's also argueable that there are many religious people with a distinct lack of faith).

Depending on your semantics moral relativism is just as much a religion as Catholocism, with it's diehard advocates as well as it's fringe elements, spin-off cults, and general no real opinion population who show up for the heck of it.
Kalium wrote:Read your Bible recently? It's not exactly nice to the fairer sex, to say the least.
It's also not particularly tolerant of unbelievers, yet I haven't picked up any stones. Unfortunately, I am pretty sure I've sinned a bit in my day, so I don't get to cast them. Yet there are female role models in the Torah/Bible/maybe even the Qu'ran(haven't read it to know, but I know they hold the tenets of the Bible and the Torah). Esther? Ruth? Deborah? Racheal? Lydia? Sarah? Dinah? I could go on but I'd actually go have to get my Bible.

I'm gonna double-post...
Life's short.
eBayhard.

User avatar
Otohiko
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:32 pm
Org Profile

Post by Otohiko » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:28 pm

requiett wrote:Alright, this topic is a little too Nietzsche for me. Clearly "God is dead" just automatically has to be applied where reason is concerned around here. It's ironically the most unreasonable assumption I've ever dealt with.
Lovely. You haven't really read Nietzsche, have you?

Why the hell do people never give the full quote?
Friedrich Nietzsche wrote:God is dead, for it is we [i.e. the humanity] who killed him
Don't mess with me on Nietzsche, dude.
The Birds are using humanity in order to throw something terrifying at this green pig. And then what happens to us all later, that’s simply not important to them…

User avatar
Shazzy
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:15 pm
Location: The Universe
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Shazzy » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:31 pm

Kalium wrote: Yes, actually, I do. I know that it's possible for them to improve their means, because it's been done. There is no reason to and every reason not to try to make them content with their measly lot.
Religion is not about opiate for the masses. Religion is about opiate for everyone who existed and exists and will exist. No matter how fortunate someone is, they are partially unhappy/without purpose/confused/lost/lacking meaning. (If you want to argue that you are an exception to this, fine, we'll exclude you.) God makes up the difference in that gaping hole in "reality." I can't speak for requiett, but I'd argue religion isn't about making someone content with their measly lot. It's about having an eternal perspective on your entire life regardless of status. If you say, "this is my life, I've got to make it count," it's easy to also say, "screw as many people as I want, I've only got a hundred years to live and no one to hold me accountable for it if I don't get caught." Eternal accountability is the best antithesis of selfishness and cruelty.
AMV guides for Mac users
DOWNLOAD THIS AMV
Quarter-life crisis: a sense that everyone is, somehow, doing better than you.

User avatar
badmartialarts
Bad Martial Artist
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:31 am
Location: In ur Kitchen Stadium, eatin ur peppurz
Org Profile

Post by badmartialarts » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:33 pm

Alright, now after saying all that.

I dislike prosleytization. Which is funny because I'm a member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, and I know my contributions to the church have gone in part to missionaries. That's not to say I don't believe in evangelism, or spreading the word of God about to whoever will hear. But I don't think you can or should be allowed to force a personal choice like faith and religion onto anyone else, and especially not the masses. Strangely enough, much like the Founding Fathers did, who were all devout memebers of various religious groups yet who were able to get together and make a more or less decent nation. Faith and science to me are two sides of a coin. I look at the world, and I see the complexity of the equations that only approximate how it's governed, and all I can do is be awed. Then I flip the coin over, and I pray to God, giving thanks to Him that I have a mind to apprciate His work.

You know, this is the most spiritual I've been in a while. I haven't been in church in a while...but as the Bible says, "Whenever two or moree people are gathered in My name, there is my church." Thanks for the sermon, everyone. I'll drop a donation in...uhm...a few months when it comes due again. :)
Life's short.
eBayhard.

User avatar
badmartialarts
Bad Martial Artist
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:31 am
Location: In ur Kitchen Stadium, eatin ur peppurz
Org Profile

Post by badmartialarts » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:34 pm

triple post

It WAS Science and Faith. dur dur dur. :)
Life's short.
eBayhard.

User avatar
requiett
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Alaska
Org Profile

Post by requiett » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:34 pm

I was using the masses example as a cynical reaction, because it seemed as though religion were something as beneath them as a common laborer.

User avatar
Kalium
Sir Bugsalot
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: Plymouth, Michigan
Org Profile

Post by Kalium » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:35 pm

badmartialarts wrote:
Kalium wrote:Read your Bible recently? It's not exactly nice to the fairer sex, to say the least.
It's also not particularly tolerant of unbelievers, yet I haven't picked up any stones. Unfortunately, I am pretty sure I've sinned a bit in my day, so I don't get to cast them. Yet there are female role models in the Torah/Bible/maybe even the Qu'ran(haven't read it to know, but I know they hold the tenets of the Bible and the Torah). Esther? Ruth? Deborah? Racheal? Lydia? Sarah? Dinah? I could go on but I'd actually go have to get my Bible.
Good thing nobody takes that bible thing literally then, hm? Especially the bits where it says one thing but means the opposite, or when it disagrees with other bits. Oh, wait a tick...

Most of the females have subordinate roles, and I'm fairly sure that Esther isn't in the Torah. She came later. Most of them matter either in what they did to get married or what they did for their husbands. Deborah is probably the only really good exception to that.

User avatar
Kalium
Sir Bugsalot
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: Plymouth, Michigan
Org Profile

Post by Kalium » Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:39 pm

Shazzy wrote:If you say, "this is my life, I've got to make it count," it's easy to also say, "screw as many people as I want, I've only got a hundred years to live and no one to hold me accountable for it if I don't get caught." Eternal accountability is the best antithesis of selfishness and cruelty.
A secular justice system does pretty well, you know. Life in jail packs a much larger punch without the whole afterlife thing when you die.

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”