Whats with you DBZ haters!? heres reasons why its good...

maarken · Post by **maarken** » Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:16 pm

PS... dont watch DBGT.. it is a waste of anime.. db, and dbz were, and still are, much better than dbgt.... anyways... thank you for your time... lol 8)

nrjize · Post by **nrjize** » Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:17 pm

dwchang wrote:I have not read this entire thread, but I have a few things to say:

1) From what I have read, a number of you need to really work on your writing and debating skills. Most of the things said defending DBZ have been fairly weak (with the exception of Milliardo's). Most of it has been "Nu uh. It rules!"

2) Most importantly, what's the point in arguing about your tastes. Let the DBZ fans like what they want and in turn, they should let you like what you like. Different strokes for different folks. At the same time, I do realize a DBZ fan started this thread and was pretty much asking for it. Regardless..this is a pointless debate. Does anyone actually believe that they're convincing the other side (even though I have seen some very witty and well-thought replies)? Both sides are fairly adamant (*cough* blind) to the other's and won't understand it.

3) This thread needs to die!

Well obviously you havent read enough, what you just said was pointless, and yes, this thread does need to die so dont post and I wont have to reply!

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:18 pm

Hehe, no problem. Not 'affected', but any argument thread is interesting for me, so just making sure it's all done in the right way. Anyway, on the subject of DBZ - I'm not even a real DBZ hater, not even skeptical like Omni for instance - I find DBZ watchable and actually went out and bought some of the movies once. As it stands though, it's definitely not at the top of my watching priority list, that's all.

As for 'Empirical' etc. - hehe, sorry if that throws you off, but it is kinda like how I usually write/talk. And it's only made wors by my new job - which is spellchecking stuff like

Dr. Wang wrote:Microcalorimetry (MC) and chemiluminescence (CL) measurements have been used to study the oxidation of unstabilised polypropylene (PP) particles. The oxidation profiles obtained by the two techniques were found to be similar although a time shift between the profiles was observed, particularly at low temperatures. The similar shape suggests a close relation between the rate of the overall oxidation process as measured by MC and the rate of the CL emitting reactions.

Yea... anyways, maybe this thread should wrap up...

[MOD467: Or I can just lock it. How about everyone agree to disagree? People will like or dislike whatever they want to and make up reasons later.]