Sword licking?

Propyro · Post by **Propyro** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 3:05 pm

No ... not a cahcete ... those are ment to by used as tools for cutting vegitation, not as weapons ... though they do a good job in a pinch.

it started with an M and had a u in there some where ... i can't remember, i have to ask my friend who tole me about them.

But yea, whenever Tolkien described Orc and goblin weapons he usualy refered to them as Scimitars.

[/|\]

El Banana · Post by **El Banana** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 4:40 pm

Propyro wrote:No ... not a cahcete ... those are ment to by used as tools for cutting vegitation, not as weapons ...
[/|\]

Tell that top the hoardes of angry colombian farmers.
Or that other guy I know who "accidentally" decapitated a person with one.

Propyro · Post by **Propyro** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 10:44 pm

yea, but i did say they work in a pinch ...

[/|\]

StarZapper · Post by **StarZapper** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 11:07 pm

Swords are all well and good... But personally I'd much rather have a Naginata. You got your slashing, your stabbing, your reach, your speed, your shield, your weight, and your style all in one. The only place where they'd be inferior would be in closed quarters with little maneuvering. Of course as with anything the victor always depends on the persons fighting. But still, I'm a spear person.

Propyro · Post by **Propyro** » Sat Nov 01, 2003 11:54 pm

bleck spears ... never liked them much. For the most part they're slow and lacking in close quarters combat.

[/|\]

Onideus_Mad_Hatter · Post by **Onideus_Mad_Hatter** » Sun Nov 02, 2003 4:49 am

StarZapper wrote:Swords are all well and good... But personally I'd much rather have a Naginata. You got your slashing, your stabbing, your reach, your speed, your shield, your weight, and your style all in one. The only place where they'd be inferior would be in closed quarters with little maneuvering. Of course as with anything the victor always depends on the persons fighting. But still, I'm a spear person.

Idealy in a fight I'd want a SX-7:

...and a BGM-109A with a W-80 250 kiloton tactical thermonuclear fussion based war head would also be handy. ^_^

Atheism · Post by **Atheism** » Sun Nov 02, 2003 5:03 am

That gun is too large.

I never thought I'd say that.

Propyro · Post by **Propyro** » Sun Nov 02, 2003 2:09 pm

Onideus_Mad_Hatter wrote: Idealy in a fight I'd want a SX-7:

...and a BGM-109A with a W-80 250 kiloton tactical thermonuclear fussion based war head would also be handy. ^_^

you can't shoot what you can't see.

[/|\]

TallonKarrde23 · Post by **TallonKarrde23** » Sun Nov 02, 2003 2:29 pm

unless you got a scope with heat sensor things...infra wtf ever. That gun is GAY --; just get an M-4 with a bipod and your good....and a Glock 26 with hollow-tip bullets is always nice on the side --; I mean, you cant beat a gun thats the powerfulest in its size...which is about 6 inches... --; But a Benneli M3 Super 90 would be the most fun.

Propyro · Post by **Propyro** » Sun Nov 02, 2003 2:34 pm

Infrared and it's called hollow point's. Very nice bullets ... make an entry wound the diameter of the bullet and an exit wound the size of a grape fruit.

I still like melee.

but personaly i think the M4 Carbine was the best weapon in delta force 2. It had both close range artilery, medium long range sniping capability. Along with close quarter burst capabilities. Though i always used it in semi-automatic to conserve ammo.

[/|\]