Or not secretly. I honestly wish I had this many threads to lock on Demonseal

Well if there is only one topic for it, who cares if they flame or spam since only those who are interested will participate. It was just an idea, I was just trying to find some middle ground between the people who like these topics and those who don't since there is a conflict of interest. I see that constructive ideas aren't very welcome so I guess I'll just shut my trap. yeesh.Brolly345 wrote:Have you even read the reason for the banning of versus threads? They tend to degenerate into a flame war, go off topic, or fall to spam. That is why they have been banned.
That's hilarious in a non-funny manner...Otohiko wrote:.Or not secretly. I honestly wish I had this many threads to lock on Demonseal
Holmes wrote:there is a conflict of interest. I see that constructive ideas aren't very welcome so I guess I'll just shut my trap. yeesh.Brolly345 wrote:Have you even read the reason for the banning of versus threads? They tend to degenerate into a flame war, go off topic, or fall to spam. That is why they have been banned.
Sometimes, just sometimes, a thread that starts out as pointless actually gains a point due to some of the members that post in it. This however, rarely happens, and if it does, is generally apparent immediately.Blue Thunder of F.H.S wrote:well i think i would at least give the pointless threads time and get a certain number of post(ie:10 posts in 7 days)and if it doesnt get it then close it down.plus wat mite sumtimes be pointless to u mite not be pointless to them and at least tell them y they are pointless(sry if repeated)