Project Orgeditor [Round 4] [Complete]

Locked
User avatar
CodeZTM
Spin Me Round
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:13 pm
Status: Flapping Lips
Location: Arkansas
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by CodeZTM » Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:49 pm

Chiiisus wrote:So it's not like the longer PM Yue sent? o_o
What pm?

User avatar
CodeZTM
Spin Me Round
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:13 pm
Status: Flapping Lips
Location: Arkansas
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by CodeZTM » Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:55 pm

Mkid wrote:
CodeZTM wrote:
Mkid wrote:is the whole, if you win you cant get disqualified thing still enacted? lol cuz thats the only possibility im making it to the next round lol
No, since it is no longer a competition round. It's just a collaboration. Everything in last night's theme needs to be wiped from memories and not associated with this new theme in any context. :rofl:
so our collab partners have work together to make a great amv rather than work against each other and show down our partners..

Basically do an amazing collab!
Yes!

User avatar
Kisanzi
Why I likes so much?
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:38 am
Status: Getting to the roof!
Location: Colorado
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by Kisanzi » Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:00 pm

This round sounds like it will be very rough and awkward for the contestants. Not only do they have to agree on a song and concept, but they also have to rely on their "partner" to do a good job and not screw them on their shared score. As a fan of the contest so far, and in the spirit of competition, I can't see why you would have a round in a competition where competitors have to work closely with and rely on their "opponents".

Weird choice, but I guess we'll see what the editors think. I hope this round doesn't hurt the quality and cohesiveness seen in the past couple rounds. Good luck guys...>.>

User avatar
Radical_Yue
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:45 pm
Status: The flamer with heart of gold~<3
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by Radical_Yue » Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:27 pm

Kisanzi wrote:This round sounds like it will be very rough and awkward for the contestants. Not only do they have to agree on a song and concept, but they also have to rely on their "partner" to do a good job and not screw them on their shared score. As a fan of the contest so far, and in the spirit of competition, I can't see why you would have a round in a competition where competitors have to work closely with and rely on their "opponents".
That being said, I'm stepping down as a judge. Not like you guys will miss me anyways :P

Thanks for the videos and the $5.

User avatar
Kitsuner
Maximum Hotness
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:38 pm
Status: Top Breeder
Location: Chicago, IL
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by Kitsuner » Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:33 pm

I heard there was an opening for a judge.

(Don't tell anyone, it's a secret!)
OtakuGray wrote:Sometimes anime can branch out to a younger audience and this is one of those times where you wish children would just go die.
Stirspeare wrote:<Stirspeare> Lopez: Vanquish my virginity and flood me with kit. ["Ladies..."]

User avatar
Mkid
Im on the case
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:08 am
Status: No more mutants.
Location: A Farm in New York
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by Mkid » Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:08 pm

Kisanzi wrote:This round sounds like it will be very rough and awkward for the contestants. Not only do they have to agree on a song and concept, but they also have to rely on their "partner" to do a good job and not screw them on their shared score. As a fan of the contest so far, and in the spirit of competition, I can't see why you would have a round in a competition where competitors have to work closely with and rely on their "opponents".

Weird choice, but I guess we'll see what the editors think. I hope this round doesn't hurt the quality and cohesiveness seen in the past couple rounds. Good luck guys...>.>
Not really I think its kinda good idea. You work with the people you've been hoping mess up. Not to mention it teaches us compromise, communication, and its just a GREAT IDEA i love this round code
Image

User avatar
CorpseGoddess
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 9:23 pm
Status: HEY GUYS
Location: Vancouver, BC
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by CorpseGoddess » Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:24 pm

What I'm really hoping for here is people with different editing styles getting paired together. I keep trying to get hubby to do a collaborative video with me, but so far he's resisted. I think it's probably so that said video won't show up as "exhibit A" in divorce court. :P
Image
Image

User avatar
EvaFan
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 10:25 pm
Status: (*゚▽゚)o旦~ ー乾杯ー♪
Location: Somerset, KY
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by EvaFan » Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:33 pm

Well in a way there are times that even enemies have to work together to get through something. This round will be interesting just to see how the collaborations go yet alone the vids.

Basically if your not a team player and like working alone, this theme is challenging you. Even if you are a team player depending on your partner it may be challenging anyway.

Just remember, from what I read on the rules... Code didn't say the AMV had to be longer than the preset time rules. The collab itself only needs to be 30 or more seconds. Split that in half and you actually have less editing to do. Most of the time spent will probably be planing and idea generating. Good luck guyz n galz.
"The people cannot be [...] always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented, in proportion to [...] the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to public liberty. What country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned [...] that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants."-Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Pwolf
Friendly Neighborhood Pwaffle
Joined: Thu May 03, 2001 4:17 pm
Location: Some where in California, I forgot :\
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by Pwolf » Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:21 pm

Kisanzi wrote:This round sounds like it will be very rough and awkward for the contestants. Not only do they have to agree on a song and concept, but they also have to rely on their "partner" to do a good job and not screw them on their shared score. As a fan of the contest so far, and in the spirit of competition, I can't see why you would have a round in a competition where competitors have to work closely with and rely on their "opponents"
I like this one better then what we were supposed to do.

User avatar
NS
I like pants
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:05 pm
Status: Pants
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Project Orgeditor [Round 4 : 2 Is Better Than 1]

Post by NS » Wed Jun 29, 2011 7:02 pm

I would just have my partner/opponent and me edit the whole song or as much as they can and then just mix 'em together. How will we know the difference?

Locked

Return to “Project OrgEditor Season 1”