That's what you do after Corbo Bash...and only if you're NightowlNineBirds wrote: party's with a bunch of hobos.
Party ends when one of the hobos pulls a knife.
StealthVisions wrote:The Reason Behind the Thread
...we can organize what needs to be brought to where and such...
...I do not have all of their personal information...
...a-m-v.org has been the common grounds between some of us. There are people that find out about this event only by means of the yearly thread. Mainly for this reason, is this topic posted on a public forum. And since this is a gathering of AMV creators at a convention, I felt this was an appropriate forum...which was deemed satisfactory for the last 3-4 years.
1) I didn't ask for an invitation. OtakuForLife was requested to be there by Ninetails. OFL also said "maybe" . I said something along the lines of "If I go, what should I bring?". You, sir, are combining OFL's invitation with my statement that this all should be done in a private medium.Way wrote: All formalities aside, I find it in very poor taste to show enough interest to ask for an invitation, and then turn around and request, "Mods, if you would please, lock this thread." It's become apparent that nobody has a problem with the thread until someone else drops the bomb of disillusionment upon their perceived sense of acceptance. You, among others, have developed a "sour grapes" attitude, and now want to strike back at the rest of us, most of whom simply want to talk amongst ourselves, and make preparations for an event during our time at Otakon.
Apparently a LOT of people have a problem with this thread.derobert wrote: [derobert: This thread seems rather pointless, and as a private party, more appropriate to a private mode of communication such as PM, email, etc. Further, it seems to be functioning as the most effective complaint magnet on the .Org forums. Locking.]
Perfectly understandable. But you see what has happened? Apparently this isn't the first year either. According to AD's post which Kusoyaro has referred to, he's needed to clear this up a lot.Corbo wrote: ...a-m-v.org has been the common grounds between some of us. There are people that find out about this event only by means of the yearly thread. Mainly for this reason, is this topic posted on a public forum. And since this is a gathering of AMV creators at a convention, I felt this was an appropriate forum...which was deemed satisfactory for the last 3-4 years.
You example is flawed. You see, in that example, the discussion isn't heard by anyone who doesn't recognize anyone. Only those people who find those people come and hear the conversation. Therefor, anyone who DOESN'T recognize someone will NOT hear the conversation. In essence, that is what I'm asking for.Sertrel wrote:Everyone keeps saying, "public forum, public forum," but let's take the real-world example. Imagine you saw a large group of people in the lobby of the Baltimore Convention Center, milling around, having fun, chatting, discussing a party they were planning. You recognize one person who you met once before at another party. Would you go up and invite yourself to their party? Would you say that just because they were discussing it in a public forum where anyone could hear them, you should be allowed to join them? Would you say that because you shared a hobby or an interest, you should be allowed to join them?
What your not getting is the difference between talking in private in a public place and having a Thread in a Public Forum.Sertrel wrote: Turn it around. Imagine if you were in your hotel room with a few friends, and suddenly someone you met once at another con drops by, along with three or four of his/her friends. And they said they overheard you talking about this party in a public area, and presumed it was an announcement.
Sertrel wrote: Nowhere in this thread was there an "open invitation," or any sort of invitation at all. See <a href="http://www.animemusicvideos.org/phpBB/v ... 1982">this thread</a> or <a href="http://www.animemusicvideos.org/phpBB/v ... 8499">this thread</a> for examples of threads with an invitation. Note the difference in tone and tenor.
Mooo on page 5 wrote: It's pretty much if your a friend of a friend of a friend etc. you're in.
Now, I'm not saying that is an invitation, but can you not see how it can be construed as a "If you know a guy at the party, you can go and bring a friend and be welcomed." Again, not saying that is what is being said, but can you not see how it can be thought of that way by another person?Mooo on page 9 wrote: It's not like there is any intricate guest list or something people usually ask to go to. It's kinda like Person A is going to the party, and he happens to bring persons B through D. So even though we might only know Person A, the friends that he/she brings along are always welcome.
They don't have to hide themselves anywhere. But if the topic of discussion isn't public, put that someplace private, not public. For reasons I've already mentioned.Sertrel wrote: go hide themselves somewhere private
But thats what I'm talking about. If its THAT common of a problem, why does it keep happening when there are obvious BETTER alternatives?SnhKnives wrote:the dead horse just can't beat itself nowadays
lol
and he seems to be quite logical most of the time, though sometimes a bit harshJbone on Page 8 wrote: For that reason alone, it's always boggled my mind that we have public threads on a forum with massive population to discuss it.
ANTDrakko wrote:But thats what I'm talking about. If its THAT common of a problem, why does it keep happening when there are obvious BETTER alternatives?SnhKnives wrote:the dead horse just can't beat itself nowadays
lol
I mean comon now, even Jbone doesn't know why this keep happening: