Editing with .flac?
- Bauzi
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:48 pm
- Status: Under High Voltage
- Location: Austria (uhm the other country without kangaroos^^)
- Contact:
Editing with .flac?
Alright!
So I found a .flac file on the net. I made a small google search and...
Free Lossless Audio Codec
Sounds nice and sounds good. What about editing with it? We know that we always should work with loosless stuff or DVD stuff in our editing studio, but what about looseless audio?
I know that there is no big filesize difference between a .flac and a PCM .wav. I´m just curious and excited about this audio codec ^^ I want to find out what´s up with it in an editing software =D
My experience today:
.flac doesn´t work in Premiere Pro 1.5 (No importer found that supports this file)
So I found a .flac file on the net. I made a small google search and...
Free Lossless Audio Codec
Sounds nice and sounds good. What about editing with it? We know that we always should work with loosless stuff or DVD stuff in our editing studio, but what about looseless audio?
I know that there is no big filesize difference between a .flac and a PCM .wav. I´m just curious and excited about this audio codec ^^ I want to find out what´s up with it in an editing software =D
My experience today:
.flac doesn´t work in Premiere Pro 1.5 (No importer found that supports this file)
You can find me on YT under "Bauzi514". Subscribe to never miss my AMV releases.
- Purge
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:18 am
- Location: Under Aus
- Bauzi
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:48 pm
- Status: Under High Voltage
- Location: Austria (uhm the other country without kangaroos^^)
- Contact:
- Qyot27
- Surreptitious fluffy bunny
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:08 pm
- Status: Creepin' between the bullfrogs
- Location: St. Pete, FL
- Contact:
I wouldn't call a 30% reduction in filesize on average (when working with 16bit 44.1kHz stereo) not a big difference.
I could imagine that open source programs would be more apt to have built-in support for FLAC, although a cursory glance didn't reveal anything to me. Possibly for editors built on gstreamer or Quicktime paired with the appropriate FLAC playback decoder.
Generally, I store my audio as FLAC in both the source archives and in the lossless master copy I make after each video is finished. Lagarith-FLAC in MKV.
I could imagine that open source programs would be more apt to have built-in support for FLAC, although a cursory glance didn't reveal anything to me. Possibly for editors built on gstreamer or Quicktime paired with the appropriate FLAC playback decoder.
Generally, I store my audio as FLAC in both the source archives and in the lossless master copy I make after each video is finished. Lagarith-FLAC in MKV.
- Bauzi
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:48 pm
- Status: Under High Voltage
- Location: Austria (uhm the other country without kangaroos^^)
- Contact:
Sounds interessting.
Some programs like Cinerlla might can handle with it. Let´s try.
Some programs like Cinerlla might can handle with it. Let´s try.
xD Yeah... I thought in small amv dimensions.I wouldn't call a 30% reduction in filesize on average (when working with 16bit 44.1kHz stereo) not a big difference.
You can find me on YT under "Bauzi514". Subscribe to never miss my AMV releases.
- Qyot27
- Surreptitious fluffy bunny
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 12:08 pm
- Status: Creepin' between the bullfrogs
- Location: St. Pete, FL
- Contact:
Yeah, well trying to do 48kHz 24-bit audio doesn't compress much at all - I got maybe 10% shaved off at the most - usually it was between 4% and 5.6% (the material was the stereo version of Bon Jovi's Have A Nice Day on the DVD-Audio part of the DualDisc edition - the process of actually getting it into wave in the first place is a pain in the ass; and by DVD-Audio, I don't mean the audio stream of the normal DVD, but the contents of the AUDIO_TS folder). I have no idea how it performed on the Surround copy from the same disk, as I wasn't monitoring it while it was encoding. Needless to say it didn't compress as much either based on the resulting filesize. In both cases the original MLP streams were more efficiently packed, and I use FLAC on level 8.Bauzi wrote:xD Yeah... I thought in small amv dimensions.I wouldn't call a 30% reduction in filesize on average (when working with 16bit 44.1kHz stereo) not a big difference.
- DayWalker B.
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:49 pm
- Status: Out on bail
- Location: Unknown
- Contact:
- DayWalker B.
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:49 pm
- Status: Out on bail
- Location: Unknown
- Contact: