2008 Judge's Choice Awards - Contest Winners
Forum rules
Coordinators who fail to maintain necessary communication with entrants, or provide timely updates on results may be barred from announcing future events.
Coordinators who fail to maintain necessary communication with entrants, or provide timely updates on results may be barred from announcing future events.
- Kitsuner
- Maximum Hotness
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:38 pm
- Status: Top Breeder
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Autraya
- Zero Punctuation
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 12:52 am
- Status: old
- Location: Terra Australis
- Contact:
- bluetrain
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:54 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Right well.. that wasn't made apparent when i posted that - rendering most of the post irrelevant - continue with life.CrackTheSky wrote:Weren't there five judges...?bluetrain wrote:Otherwise i'm very happy with the chosen judges 3 very different ppl is always good.
*one day something with some effort will reside here*
-
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 10:21 am
- Location: maine
- ZephyrStar
- Master of Science
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:04 am
- Status: 3D
- Location: The Laboratory
- Contact:
- Bakadeshi
- Abuses Spellcheck
- Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2003 9:49 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
good list of winners.... I personally think they both serve their purpose and don;t think any is particularly greater then the other (regards to VCA vs JCA) One is judged by the viewers, and one is judged by the judges. VCAs is more a popularity contest, while JCAs are more technically analized. I think we should keep both around.