The Improv Project

Phantasmagoriat · Post by **Phantasmagoriat** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:12 pm

I gotta say, that kept me quite entertained. and the idea was so simple it was genius

CrackTheSky · Post by **CrackTheSky** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:37 pm

Greggus1 wrote:I think enjoyment of the project depends very much on your knowledge of the editors in the project. This was an experiment more than anything else, and for people interested in seeing the results, it's uploaded to the org. In that sense, from the very beginning of the project, the point was never quality, but experimenting-which can go good or bad.

Ben, feel free to expand on that.

Actually, you more or less said it perfectly.

This was never intended to be MEP of Year, or something. The purpose of this project, as I said many times in the thread, is to force the editors involved to do something different, something they very well may have never tried before.

This isn't meant to get the people who don't like the project to all of a sudden like it. But you have to understand what kind of project this was meant to be. Which is why when the project receives an op that says, "I think the standards on a-m-v.org have really dropped recently and this doesn't help it", I get a little irked because that just shows that some people don't really get the goal of this project. If you watch this MEP the way you watch pretty much every other MEP on the .org, you're missing something.

Niotex · Post by **Niotex** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:47 pm

Then market it more. Like IC Idols did.

Kristyrat · Post by **Kristyrat** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:13 pm

-Reda- wrote:I also don't understand why the editors didn't cut their songs better. A lot of them just came to a stop suddenly. Its not TOO difficult to edit audio and I think it would have been nice if more editors took the time to do this well.

IIRC, we didn't have a choice and had to use the audio exactly as it was given to us.

As for the project, I can't say I was expecting much, it was definitely an interesting concept, but not one that lends to 'omgawsm' tracks. As it's been said, there was good among the bad, and I'd like to point out that I absolutely hated my track and the song I got.

[Kristyrat]

wurpess · Post by **wurpess** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:54 pm

The "full" version of my track, if anyone really cares. Though there was only another 18 seconds of music at the end that wasn't in my segment. Not the best quality, but its there.

Kitsuner · Post by **Kitsuner** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:08 pm

CrackTheSky wrote:The purpose of this project, as I said many times in the thread, is to force the editors involved to do something different, something they very well may have never tried before.

Incidentally, instrumentals are dumb.

Autraya · Post by **Autraya** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:11 pm

a strange baby you gave birth to after your nine month pregancy, I hope you know who the father is O.O

Copycat_Revolver · Post by **Copycat_Revolver** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:51 pm

Kitsuner wrote:Incidentally, instrumentals are dumb.

Amen.

I'll comment properly on the project later.

omegaevolution · Post by **omegaevolution** » Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:31 pm

Kitsuner wrote:
CrackTheSky wrote:The purpose of this project, as I said many times in the thread, is to force the editors involved to do something different, something they very well may have never tried before.
Incidentally, instrumentals are dumb.

awwwwww I thought the person next to me would like it

I had some other crazy instrumentals I wanted to see edited lol. But at least they weren't beeps XD

@Autraya: I was going to say that... and I think WC is the father

Ingow · Post by **Ingow** » Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:43 am

wurpess wrote:Improv Night at the Cafe with Dear Daniel

can't believe you actually gave it a perfect Tom Waits kinda title