Justin Credible wrote:Not always, Although Sega Master System was much beter then Nintendo... SNES was way better then Genesis. hardware wise and game wise... the only thing Sega had up on SNES was sports games...
Well the Genesis had a more powerful CPU, but it had a more limited video processor in many respects. It topped the SNES on resolution (The SNES could go higher than the Genesis, but only by turning off all the fancy 2d acceleration features, really only good for title screens), but the SNES had a superior color gamut and had more 2D acceleration features like rotation. If you knew what you were doing you could drastically improve the number of onscreen colors of the Genesis, but it gets complicated once you add sprites and you still can't match the color capabilities of the SNES. As far as audio is concerned, the SNES used samples for all of it's music so if you have good samples it sounds good, but some games used cruddy samples to save space. The Genesis used FM synthesis, some people like it others don't.
As far as games are concerned, Sonic is way cooler than Mario any day and there were plenty of great titles for the system though you won't find many Japanese titles for it as it wasn't very popular over there.
The Sega Master system hardware was superior to the NES hardware in all ways but sound. The NES had a slightly superior sound chip. It could produce several different wave types, like sawtooth whereas the SMS could only produce square waves. Then again the Japanese SMS had an FM chip which was far superior to the NES audio chip.