Need help for a high qulity mp4 avisynth script for you.tube

Scintilla · Post by **Scintilla** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:12 pm

AaronAMV wrote:rofl...
You know all you have to do is click them?

You don't think that's the first thing I tried?

AaronAMV · Post by **AaronAMV** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:13 pm

Scintilla wrote:
AaronAMV wrote:rofl...
You know all you have to do is click them?
You don't think that's the first thing I tried?

You never know. Why don't you just delete the messages?

JaddziaDax · Post by **JaddziaDax** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:38 pm

the tube's "email system" is a joke

Mosc · Post by **Mosc** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:35 am

Scintilla wrote:And the difference is noticeable -- you still wouldn't want to watch them full screen, but it's not <i>complete</i> garbage anymore.

I disagree. They're less blocky, but tend to look very artificial, partly because their crappy H.264 encoder couldn't get edges in (high-motion) animation to look straight. Also, they managed to mess up audio encoding. For some reason, it sounds like they decided to run a 1-pass normalizer on every AAC encode which results in extremely annoying volume bumps on some videos, especially at the beginning.

surfsama · Post by **surfsama** » Thu Aug 07, 2008 11:57 am

So...back to your question. I've tried several filter schemes and settings and all look horrible on the tube when using mp4 compression.
My only "success" at getting a decent upload is using mpeg compression at 640x480.
Even that is hit-or-miss.

AaronAMV · Post by **AaronAMV** » Thu Aug 07, 2008 12:44 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ962u2UkaI
That's what happened when I uploaded a h264 mp4.... |:

JaddziaDax · Post by **JaddziaDax** » Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:46 pm

all formats are hit and miss, cause depending on how much movement is in the clip will depend on how blocky it gets :/

mirkosp · Post by **mirkosp** » Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:02 pm

Well...

http://tinyurl.com/5pqb8r

I suggest you to watch this at full screen. It's 848x640 on Youtube. Srsly. Though, length must be at most around 1:10 minutes. I personally don't know how to do this stuff... still, if you want to upload an high quality file to the tube, you might want to ask to who uploaded this... check his profile, there's some info.

dokidoki · Post by **dokidoki** » Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:20 pm

mirkosp wrote:I personally don't know how to do this stuff... still, if you want to upload an high quality file to the tube, you might want to ask to who uploaded this... check his profile, there's some info.

There was a hack to upload higher quality files, but it's been removed. The thread is 56 pages so maybe there have been other ways to get around re-encoding discovered since the original post, but I don't know.

http://forum.videohelp.com/topic336882.html

AaronAMV · Post by **AaronAMV** » Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:06 pm

dokidoki wrote:
mirkosp wrote:I personally don't know how to do this stuff... still, if you want to upload an high quality file to the tube, you might want to ask to who uploaded this... check his profile, there's some info.
There was a hack to upload higher quality files, but it's been removed. The thread is 56 pages so maybe there have been other ways to get around re-encoding discovered since the original post, but I don't know.

http://forum.videohelp.com/topic336882.html

At one point it was doing something along the lines of encoding it with something in a .flv container, but it doesn't work I don't think anymore.