Best of the following programs?
-
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:49 pm
Best of the following programs?
I'm torn between a few programs;
Adobe Premiere,
Sony Vegas
and Final Cut Pro.
I am leaning towards Sony Vegas, or Adobe more but I don't wanna make a mistake in wasting 100$+ lol.
What I understand is Sony Vegas is a bit complicated and takes a lot more time, but the effects come out amazing, and Adobe is a little more simple, and still has good effects.
So my question is, which do you preferr the most, and if you could, tell me some of the features in them. Like, do any of these have a drag and drop option, for simpler effects(like in windows movie maker), stuff like that ^^
Thnx- Wayde
Adobe Premiere,
Sony Vegas
and Final Cut Pro.
I am leaning towards Sony Vegas, or Adobe more but I don't wanna make a mistake in wasting 100$+ lol.
What I understand is Sony Vegas is a bit complicated and takes a lot more time, but the effects come out amazing, and Adobe is a little more simple, and still has good effects.
So my question is, which do you preferr the most, and if you could, tell me some of the features in them. Like, do any of these have a drag and drop option, for simpler effects(like in windows movie maker), stuff like that ^^
Thnx- Wayde
- NS
- I like pants
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:05 pm
- Status: Pants
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Contact:
- Vivaldi
- Polemic Apologist
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:39 am
- Location: Petting mah cat..
Re: Best of the following programs?
[quote="wayderz"
What I understand is Sony Vegas is a bit complicated and takes a lot more time, but the effects come out amazing, and Adobe is a little more simple, and still has good effects.[/quote]
It's actually kinda vice versa of that really, adobe is usually considered more complicated, but has a very slight edge in editing ability. Vegas is simpler, (it's basicly drag and drop.) But has a more robust effects system. (if you include masking). Both are light years ahead of windows movie maker in terms of effects and editing abillty. B&W and negitive are both fairly basic effects. I believe adobe's alittle better at very pricise cuts 'cause it has a better scrubber, but they both can do it.
In the end they both preform equaly well. It's all about the person editing.
PS. I happen to use sony vegas.
PPS. I have no idea about FCP, from what I've heard it's basicly Adobe primire for the mac, but who listens to rumours.
What I understand is Sony Vegas is a bit complicated and takes a lot more time, but the effects come out amazing, and Adobe is a little more simple, and still has good effects.[/quote]
It's actually kinda vice versa of that really, adobe is usually considered more complicated, but has a very slight edge in editing ability. Vegas is simpler, (it's basicly drag and drop.) But has a more robust effects system. (if you include masking). Both are light years ahead of windows movie maker in terms of effects and editing abillty. B&W and negitive are both fairly basic effects. I believe adobe's alittle better at very pricise cuts 'cause it has a better scrubber, but they both can do it.
In the end they both preform equaly well. It's all about the person editing.
PS. I happen to use sony vegas.
PPS. I have no idea about FCP, from what I've heard it's basicly Adobe primire for the mac, but who listens to rumours.
- Vivaldi
- Polemic Apologist
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:39 am
- Location: Petting mah cat..
Re: Best of the following programs?
Fix'dVivaldi wrote:It's actually kinda vice versa of that really, adobe is usually considered more complicated, but has a very slight edge in editing ability. Vegas is simpler, (it's basicly drag and drop.) But has a more robust effects system. (if you include masking). Both are light years ahead of windows movie maker in terms of effects and editing abillty. B&W and negitive are both fairly basic effects. I believe adobe's alittle better at very pricise cuts 'cause it has a better scrubber, but they both can do it.wayderz wrote:
What I understand is Sony Vegas is a bit complicated and takes a lot more time, but the effects come out amazing, and Adobe is a little more simple, and still has good effects.
In the end they both preform equaly well. It's all about the person editing.
PS. I happen to use sony vegas.
PPS. I have no idea about FCP, from what I've heard it's basicly Adobe primire for the mac, but who listens to rumours.
Also, you can just download a trial for both and see which you like better before you buy one.
- AaronAMV
- eating that e. coli spinach
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:54 pm
- Status: (◔ ◡ ◔ )
- Location: (◔ ◡ ◔ )
- JaddziaDax
- Crazy Cat Lady!
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:25 am
- Status: I has a TRU Arceus
- Location: somewhere i think O.o
- Contact:
the level of difficulty depends usually on which one you pick up first. For instance if you picked up Vegas first you would find Premiere "backwards"... if you picked up Premiere first you might find Vegas backwards O.o.
Though the way the programs work seems to be the polar opposite they both get the job done either way..
My suggestion is to go to their sites and download the trials and figure out which one you like best.
Though the way the programs work seems to be the polar opposite they both get the job done either way..
My suggestion is to go to their sites and download the trials and figure out which one you like best.
- Falconone
- get the Punch
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 11:38 am
- Status: the Time of AMVs ends... or not?
- Location: Passau, Germany
- JaddziaDax
- Crazy Cat Lady!
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:25 am
- Status: I has a TRU Arceus
- Location: somewhere i think O.o
- Contact:
- Falconone
- get the Punch
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 11:38 am
- Status: the Time of AMVs ends... or not?
- Location: Passau, Germany