Full Metal Alchemist

This section is for the rational discussion of anime on a series basis. Spoilers should be expected, but please be courteous to your fellow users.
Post Reply
User avatar
guy07
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 1:28 pm
Status: Back in beard.
Location: T.O.
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by guy07 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:08 am

I watched that ... why? :?

User avatar
guardiansoulblade
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:58 pm
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by guardiansoulblade » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:32 am

guy07 wrote:I watched that ... why? :?
Are you talking about a fansub of the new series? The legal stream comes out tomorrow. At 12:00 EST

User avatar
76
Ninja mother-figure
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:48 pm
Status: Learning
Location: in the clouds, crying over a dying world
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by 76 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:06 pm

I totally agree with Ishbalan on all counts.

This series deserved more justice.

-76
Everything came from nothing, therefore everything is nothing.

There's nothing to worry about.

User avatar
76
Ninja mother-figure
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:48 pm
Status: Learning
Location: in the clouds, crying over a dying world
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by 76 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:09 pm

Oh, and in case it hasn't already been mentioned: The original way they revealed his automail stomped the bloody, lumpy shit out of this new episode. They barely made anything of it - like it was old news or something, and the Ice-alchemist's reaction to it was damn-weak compared to the Priest's in "To challenge the sun".

Failure.
:down: :down:
Everything came from nothing, therefore everything is nothing.

There's nothing to worry about.

User avatar
guardiansoulblade
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:58 pm
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by guardiansoulblade » Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:05 pm

Maybe they didn't want fans to think, "Oh no, it's deja vu, I've seen this already with the first series." I won't pass judgment on it until I watch it tomorrow. It's only had one episode, maybe they'll put it in the story later.

Pas
のヮの
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 5:08 pm
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by Pas » Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:09 pm

Methinks people should stop comparing this shit to the original broadcast of the series. It's essentially the same as all the people who bitched about the anime not being the same as the manga in the beginning. And yet now they go ahead and make a version more faithful to the manga there are still people that bitch about THAT not being close enough to the anime adaption.

Stop watching just to compare. If you seriously can't see anything redeemable about the new broadcast, and love the previous anime adaption you can always go back to watching that. They are not the same show, there's no point in saying one isn't as good as the other based on how they decide to handle the events.

tl;dr don't watch to hate.

User avatar
76
Ninja mother-figure
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 10:48 pm
Status: Learning
Location: in the clouds, crying over a dying world
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by 76 » Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:36 pm

I do not watch to hate, though there was nothing redeeming about that. It was a total failure.

Was there anything about an "Ice Alchemist" in the first manga? Not that I remember. (Or: did anything in that episode match up to anything in the manga?)

So your argument is invalid.

-76
Everything came from nothing, therefore everything is nothing.

There's nothing to worry about.

Pas
のヮの
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 5:08 pm
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by Pas » Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:54 pm

76 wrote:Was there anything about an "Ice Alchemist" in the first manga? Not that I remember. (Or: did anything in that episode match up to anything in the manga?)
Yes. Emphasis on "IN THE MANGA". This isn't the manga, it's an adaption of that. The producers still have some leeway for original content, otherwise we'd be seeing nothing new.
76 wrote:So your argument is invalid.
I'm telling you that it's rather pointless to be watching a show merely for the purposes of pointing out how badly said show fails. I was always under the impression that anime was a hobby, and people would watch it to enjoy. I'm not saying you can't say anything bad about it but if you honestly believe, and I quote "there was nothing redeeming about that" then why bother watching it? Unless of course you're simply watching to see if anything changes within the next few episodes. It was, after all just the first episode. And from what I can recall, plenty of great series have started off with a strange/bad initial episode.

Once again I'd say to just watch the show for what it is. You're certainly not going to enjoy it if you continue to compare every aspect of it to the manga/anime because it won't be the same. It's a new show, expect some changes.

User avatar
Vivaldi
Polemic Apologist
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:39 am
Location: Petting mah cat..
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by Vivaldi » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:21 pm

76 wrote:I do not watch to hate, though there was nothing redeeming about that. It was a total failure.

Was there anything about an "Ice Alchemist" in the first manga? Not that I remember. (Or: did anything in that episode match up to anything in the manga?)

So your argument is invalid.

-76
The first series was accurate to the manga, for the first 20 episodes, with this series , Instead if having 20 OF THE EXACT SAME EPISODES. is having one or two ANIME ONLY EPISODES to quickly bring it up to speed. It's not suppose to be the same.

What part of that DON'T. YOU. GET?

In fact I think we've been over this several times, and you always conveniently ignore that part of the post. Which means either you're not reading at all, or you're just Bawwing for the sake of it.
Image
Image
<Kenzichu> HAHAHA!!
<Kenzichu> everyone died!

User avatar
hasteroth
lost the bet
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:15 pm
Status: Neither here nor there
Location: Around
Org Profile

Re: Full Metal Alchemist

Post by hasteroth » Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:51 pm

Vivaldi wrote:
76 wrote:I do not watch to hate, though there was nothing redeeming about that. It was a total failure.

Was there anything about an "Ice Alchemist" in the first manga? Not that I remember. (Or: did anything in that episode match up to anything in the manga?)

So your argument is invalid.

-76
The first series was accurate to the manga, for the first 20 episodes, with this series , Instead if having 20 OF THE EXACT SAME EPISODES. is having one or two ANIME ONLY EPISODES to quickly bring it up to speed. It's not suppose to be the same.

What part of that DON'T. YOU. GET?

In fact I think we've been over this several times, and you always conveniently ignore that part of the post. Which means either you're not reading at all, or you're just Bawwing for the sake of it.
Anime exclusive episodes bring a sort of new flavour into the show, a nice change in pace, a kick start for a new show, etc. Most of us know what happens and it'd be boring if it started the exact same as the original.
<Hacchinya> Stirspeare: ambassador of gaysex
<Stirspeare> Hacchinya: God's own ambassador.

Post Reply

Return to “Anime Series Discussion”