TwilightChrono wrote:I think you've gone through enough members of the MEP
Is that a shot?
You make it sound like I've pissed off everyone in the MEP, when I've done nothing of the sort inside this MEP. Stuff that happens outside this MEP should not have any bearing on this MEP at all. Or, was that not a rule? It's not my fault if the other members can't keep their cool.
When it starts to effect other members' activity in the MEP, it becomes a problem. I wont say who, but one person bluntly said that they dont want to be in the same MEP as you. When you repeat the same arguments that we've had in beta testing outside the MEP, showing us that you are most likely not willing to change your editing or improve on your stuff, then it effects this MEP. That's some wishful thinking if you think that there's a 100% exception to anything said outside the MEP.
TwilightChrono wrote:And since when do my own thoughts not matter in this MEP. I am a coordinator and as such, I believe I have the right to make decisions just as you do LA. You gotta remember who originally started this MEP. Just a thought. And as for a beta tester, I thought I had stated that Hagaren is my beta tester? Or am I being Usurped again? My thoughts in the original post before I edited it still stand FYI.
I'm just wondering who's going to be able to finish this MEP.
TwilightChrono wrote:I'm all for Vivaldi being a beta tester, but I originally asked Hagaren. So, he stays as one as well, unless he doesn't want to in which I will graciously accept his decision.
You can have both Vivaldi and Hagaren, but Vivaldi is actually going to be your step by step person. He's your specialist. Hagaren can come and go as he chooses, but Vivaldi and I are in an agreement that he will stick with you.
TwilightChrono wrote: And why don't you have any more patience for me LA? Or did I just somehow magically piss you off?
You would have to be blind to think that I was okay with everything that's happened through this mep.
Expecting other members to follow quality standards, but getting upset that you need to fix frame blending?
Saying people approved of your beta when they never saw it?
Arguing endlessly about your betas, instead of actually improving them?
Expecting others to re-edit their stuff, but complain endlessly and telling us to 'deal' with it?
You seriously think that I was okay with all of this? Don't act like this has come out of no where because although I've sugar coated things for you, I think you should be able to pick up on: It's not fair that everyone else that you have had so much leeway in this mep. If it was anyone else, they would have been dropped long ago for just refusing to improve on their work, be the reason for lack of footage or whatever. Not having the resources to edit or the patience/time is not an excuse and people who watch your track won't think about it or take it into consideration, even if they actually do take the time to read the description.
im going to edit during my track during that time and hope some of you guys will be online to beta test
