Project Editor II : [Round 2] [Update: Page 130]

Announcement & discussion of Anime Music Video contests
Forum rules
Coordinators who fail to maintain necessary communication with entrants, or provide timely updates on results may be barred from announcing future events.
Locked
User avatar
Orestes
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:43 am
Status: Kill the King
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - Judging]

Post by Orestes » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:32 pm

Code wrote:1: Zetzu 88.4%
2: Kitsuner 87.6%
3: Nya 85.9%
4: Yannis 85.4%
5: Vivaldi 85.2%
6: Bauzi 83%
7: LantisEScudo 78.2%
8: Angelyco 75 %
9: PzYrm 74.8%
10: AaronAMV 74.2%
11: Godix 72%
12: Dar 71.5%
13: Inan 68.8%
14: Haze. 68.4%
14: L.Fist 68.4%
15: Neverend 67%
16: Gotenks 63.6%
17: Funstorm 62.4%
We got a problem here. ^
Code wrote: 14: Haze. 68.4%
15: L.Fist 68.4%
16: Neverend 67%
17: Gotenks 63.6%
18: Funstorm 62.4%
Unless it was on purpose. :sweat:

/edit:
81 :up:
Last edited by Orestes on Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image

User avatar
AaronAMV
eating that e. coli spinach
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:54 pm
Status: (◔ ◡ ◔ )
Location: (◔ ◡ ◔ )
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by AaronAMV » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:32 pm

same percent tommy.
Image

User avatar
Orestes
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 2:43 am
Status: Kill the King
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by Orestes » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:33 pm

AaronAMV wrote:same percent tommy.
See
Thats why I don't pay attention. :nono:

*Facepalm*
Image
Image

User avatar
Ghet
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:02 pm
Status: >.<
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by Ghet » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:34 pm

NerdStrudel wrote:
I wasn't spelling correcting you. I was literally asking why be lenient? there is no good reason to ever be lenient really. You should give these people all real scores and tell each of them your opinion about what they did right and wrong.
i actually did comment on each video and specifically say what needs to be fixed, but in terms of scoring i gave higher scores than i usually would have because...

well, i really dont know why, other than cause i felt bad throwing around 50s and 60s at such an early stage. >.>

edit: wheres the .æ that i gave to dar?
Last edited by Ghet on Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
Chez
Not Mexican
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 5:00 pm
Status: Who am I?
Location: Texas
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by Chez » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:36 pm

yeah i judged these like my homework gets graded |:
Image I stream and stuff o.o

User avatar
NS
I like pants
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:05 pm
Status: Pants
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by NS » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:36 pm

I don't understand why though. If you don't throw around true scores that videos deserve early on then it's possible that editors that don't deserve the win move on or whatever. I suppose you're the judge so it doesn't matter what I say, I'm just wondering why you would choose to NOT be completely honest in your scores.

User avatar
prYzm
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:05 am
Location: 'Stralia
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by prYzm » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:36 pm

judges told me i failed the theme ><

im sad cause its true, i guess thats what happens when you pick a comedy song to a serious anime, and have never done anything even like a tribute amv before. O_o
Image

User avatar
godix
a disturbed member
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 12:13 am
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by godix » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:37 pm

NerdStrudel wrote:I don't understand why though. If you don't throw around true scores that videos deserve early on then it's possible that editors that don't deserve the win move on or whatever. I suppose you're the judge so it doesn't matter what I say, I'm just wondering why you would choose to NOT be completely honest in your scores.
AS long as they were 'dishonest' in the same way, it wouldn't matter. All lowering the scores would do is just lower the score required to go to the second round. It doesn't matter if your last two spots are rated at 20 or 80, as long as they're still you're last two.
Image

User avatar
NS
I like pants
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:05 pm
Status: Pants
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by NS » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:39 pm

Yah I was thinking that towards the end of typing but post but then decided to be stubborn.

User avatar
Emotive
...the Meditant
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 12:20 pm
Org Profile

Re: Project Editor II : [Project Full] [Round 1 - RESULTS PG80]

Post by Emotive » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:39 pm

Epic award of epicness is epic enuff for me. |:>

Demand #16, and going to blabbler. Going to bed, that is.
Image

Locked

Return to “AMV Contests”