kireblue wrote:I think that your comment is a bit unfair. Qwaqa was nominated 23 times simply because he/she has 3 different videos that are all worthy of being the "video of the year". And since Its common for "video of the year" nominations to be nominated in multiple categories, these results make perfect sense.Nunchuck wrote:qwaqa is nominated 23 times and will probably win 11 out of 23 categories. This success is not deserved but hyped!
I personally feel that Qwaqa deserved every single one of his/her nominations. If "Time" "Chill Out" or "Property of a Lady" had been nominated for something like "best horror" or "best dance", then yes, you would have a point. But since all of the nominations were in appropriate categories, its not right to say that he/she doesn't deserve them.
+1Bauzi wrote:This qwaqa guy has such an insange impact. It's fascinating. His vids don't have that much hits and opinions, he has nearly no forum presence, but yet again he dominates the finals.
I only saw his Ian Flemming vid and I don't think that his other videos have worse quality so I pretty much think that he deserved to be in the finals. Somebody who has such an impact on an audience probably has to win a VIEWER choice award. Don't you think so?
Mhm... I don't know. Isn't it a bit unfair? and maybe this year is only an exception. However this isn't a bad idea though.Next year organizers should minimize the maximum number of videos/1 editor in each category. I think 1 AMV/ 1 category would be fine.
I miss quit a lot of my favourite vids in the finals. I guess I don't know most of them.Time to watch a lot of videos.
see? however i am surprised on which video and in which category 
