Rookie of the Year

[MagicDarkLight]

Cecco

His akross vid for instance

[Radical_Yue]

Cecco

His akross vid for instance

Cecco is ineligible for this category. He has videos out that were made and released before 2012

[lloyd9988]

BecauseI'mBored. He's been improving immensely with each and every vid ^_^

[Radical_Yue]

BecauseI'mBored. He's been improving immensely with each and every vid ^_^

1) She
2) She has videos existing prior to 2012. Ineligible for Rookie of the Year.

[lloyd9988]

BecauseI'mBored. He's been improving immensely with each and every vid ^_^

1) She
2) She has videos existing prior to 2012. Ineligible for Rookie of the Year.

1) Oh...
2) Dammit ;_;

[BecauseImBored1]

BecauseI'mBored. He's been improving immensely with each and every vid ^_^

1) She
2) She has videos existing prior to 2012. Ineligible for Rookie of the Year.

1) Oh...
2) Dammit ;_;

Wow thank you though ! But yeah my mmv is 2011 lol and I have some terrible amvs dating to 2010 XD....and I mean terrible

[Kireblue]

I don't feel that Rookie of the year should have a hard cut off for editors that made a vid more then a year ago. But I do understand that we need clear standards about who counts as a rookie. I feel that Zanzaben is a great candidate for this award, but since he actually made his first vid in on 10/15/11, the current rules make him illegible. It should also be noted that his is categorized wrong. It was made for Project org editor this year, but be accidentally put the premiere date as 05/21/11 instead of 05/21/12.

So in a nutshell, I feel that the 1 year rule should have some flexibility for editors that released their first vid towards the end of 2011.

[[madaraxD]]

cariuchiha
Its his first year of editing, and he really made a lot of progress,he is really unknown here, so i recommend watch his videos.

[NearSashiro]

Cariuchiha

In his first year,their progress is was great

[irriadin]

I don't feel that Rookie of the year should have a hard cut off for editors that made a vid more then a year ago. But I do understand that we need clear standards about who counts as a rookie. I feel that Zanzaben is a great candidate for this award, but since he actually made his first vid in on 10/15/11, the current rules make him illegible. It should also be noted that his is categorized wrong. It was made for Project org editor this year, but be accidentally put the premiere date as 05/21/11 instead of 05/21/12.

So in a nutshell, I feel that the 1 year rule should have some flexibility for editors that released their first vid towards the end of 2011.

I get where you're coming from... but this is "Rookie of the Year" not "Rookie of the indeterminate time period that is flexible just because we want it to be" :/