Daredevil

§_Akuma_§ · Post by **§_Akuma_§** » Sat Feb 15, 2003 2:42 am

i also just got back from watching DD.

i have to agree with Ranma on this one. there was indeed too much computer graphics. some parts of the movie i thought were kinda......screwed up and needed a bit more work but as for the character choice's.....VERY NICE!!! they all acted almost perfectly as to how they would in the comics (btw, im not much of a comic reader so i dont know much about any marvel comics but i have read a few)

overall: EXCELLENT MOVIE!!!

lol 1 more thing, after seeing this movie and watching the previews, i cant wait to see X-Men 2 (was wanting to see it really badly anyways), and i also want to see The Hulk more then i did at first! they made that movie look soo much better.

El Banana · Post by **El Banana** » Sat Feb 15, 2003 5:50 am

Haven't seen it, but I'm a big enough comic reader to go anyway. I hope it's allright. I HATED X-men, though I kinda liked spiderman. I just hope they don't completely butcher all of those other projects.

What's the name of the new batman, by the way?

AKH257 · Post by **AKH257** » Sat Feb 15, 2003 11:37 am

R-A-N-M-A wrote:I too just saw daredevil. It was yes awsome, but I had one huge problem with it! BIG BIG BIG BIG! Problem with it! HALF THE FUCKING MOVIE WAS COMPUTER GRAPHICS! So-so ONES AT THAT!

yeah but spider man had the same amount of cg maybe more but daredevil didnt look as fake. and spider-man was a wuss in the movie

SecondChild · Post by **SecondChild** » Sat Feb 15, 2003 12:20 pm

KhayotiK wrote: Batman went bad after Batman Returns, I wish it wouldn't have become the more child-oriented cartoon style, compared to its much more thrilling and picturesque (sp?) predecessors.

Batman is dark, it's a dark comic, much moreso even than X-man, say.

Tim Burton knows how to do dark, the other directors (I don't even know who they are) screwed it up.

I had heard that Aronofsky was going to do the next Batman, but I didn't hold out hope, because he seems too much of an auteur. However, there is hope; with the director of Memento at the helm, the next Batman may be decent.

I just can't see Guy Pierce as Batman.

I honestly liked Keaton's performances, he played angst surprisingly well. Well... we'll see, ne?

R-A-N-M-A · Post by **R-A-N-M-A** » Sat Feb 15, 2003 12:21 pm

AKH257 wrote:
R-A-N-M-A wrote:I too just saw daredevil. It was yes awsome, but I had one huge problem with it! BIG BIG BIG BIG! Problem with it! HALF THE FUCKING MOVIE WAS COMPUTER GRAPHICS! So-so ONES AT THAT!
yeah but spider man had the same amount of cg maybe more but daredevil didnt look as fake. and spider-man was a wuss in the movie

Yeah, I'll give you that. bUt I would have liked it better had some more of the church part with bullseye been not CG.

AKH257 · Post by **AKH257** » Sat Feb 15, 2003 1:59 pm

yeah those cg flips and jumps seemed so fake

KhayotiK · Post by **KhayotiK** » Sat Feb 15, 2003 7:37 pm

SecondChild wrote:
KhayotiK wrote: Batman went bad after Batman Returns, I wish it wouldn't have become the more child-oriented cartoon style, compared to its much more thrilling and picturesque (sp?) predecessors.
Batman is dark, it's a dark comic, much moreso even than X-man, say.

Tim Burton knows how to do dark, the other directors (I don't even know who they are) screwed it up.

I had heard that Aronofsky was going to do the next Batman, but I didn't hold out hope, because he seems too much of an auteur. However, there is hope; with the director of Memento at the helm, the next Batman may be decent.

I just can't see Guy Pierce as Batman.

I honestly liked Keaton's performances, he played angst surprisingly well. Well... we'll see, ne?

Guy Pierce, the next Batman? *Loads .45 and sticks it in mouth.* I'd like to actually shoot the people in charge of picking the actors, as Keaton was the only Batman that I fully appreciated. And yes, the first two movies were dark, the way they were meant to be. I just hope that they go back to their roots with this next installment.

Rozard · Post by **Rozard** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 12:44 am

x2 about all Batman statements.

In my opinion, if Spiderman was an A, I'd give Daredevil a B+. I just can't wait for X-Men 2

gadoo · Post by **gadoo** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:52 am

I just wanna know...was daredevil just an action movie with a comic guy in it? or is it actually an interesting movie to watch?

EarthCurrent · Post by **EarthCurrent** » Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 am

AKH257 wrote:yeah but spider man had the same amount of cg maybe more but daredevil didnt look as fake. and spider-man was a wuss in the movie

Go read the original Stan Lee run of Spider Man...the movie stayed pretty true to the character as depicted there.