Daredevil

This forum is for actual topics of discussion that do not fit the above categories.
Locked
User avatar
Jace Tsunami
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 5:56 am
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Jace Tsunami » Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:04 am

Chaos Angel wrote:Someone had the idea to make X-Men into a movie. It did so well, they decided to rai the comic shelves t see what else they could make.

Although, DD does look good, I didn't think Spiderman was too horribly impressive m'self.

As long as they don't make a Stars and S.T.R.I.P.E. movie, I'll be content. I liked it, but movie material it ain't.
uh... NO

as we all know Stan Lee is the founder and creator of Marvel, he lost rights some 20 years ago. There's been a big law suit ever since trailing on this whole time, and he recently got rights back. X-men was made by the other people, and when it drowned it furthered the fact stan Lee should own his own fucking industry. That's why they're making an X-men 2, that was their view, this new one is stan lees view.

But the reason to answer Mr. Pilkington's question is that they recently got back their rights and so they're making movies. We've always noticed people wearing batman and Superman Tees (I mean you can get them at any 6 flags or WB store) but some of you guys may be noticing the new wave of shirts such as Captain America. The Marvel industry is booming every where since they got their rights back.

I'm not exactly sure of the entire senario, but I'm posotive this is the case, if you care enough to make up bull shit story's to make your self look like you know what you're talking about, perhaps you'll care enough to look up who they lost their rights to. I'm sure it's on the internet some where.

and Mr. Pilkington, as for Batman, i don't think the Batman-superman movie is do out until summer 2004 or 5, it's definetly not do this year. That movies just coming out because another batman's do, has nothing to do with the comic book craze, that movies been in the works for years.
http://www.punkaddict.com

myspace.com/punkaddict

User avatar
KungPaoChicken
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2002 12:41 pm
Location: California
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by KungPaoChicken » Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:18 am

sorry, just had to chime in... the Batman vs. Superman movie has been canned.

User avatar
Jace Tsunami
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 5:56 am
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Jace Tsunami » Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:20 am

really? why?
they were planning for it so long
http://www.punkaddict.com

myspace.com/punkaddict

User avatar
Chaos Angel
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 11:34 am
Location: Vidderating
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Chaos Angel » Sun Feb 16, 2003 10:53 am

Jace Tsunami wrote: as we all know Stan Lee is the founder and creator of Marvel, he lost rights some 20 years ago. There's been a big law suit ever since trailing on this whole time, and he recently got rights back. X-men was made by the other people, and when it drowned it furthered the fact stan Lee should own his own fucking industry. That's why they're making an X-men 2, that was their view, this new one is stan lees view.
Really? I was under the impression that X-Men 1 did pretty good in the box offices.
Jace Tsunami wrote:I'm not exactly sure of the entire senario, but I'm posotive this is the case, if you care enough to make up bull shit story's to make your self look like you know what you're talking about, perhaps you'll care enough to look up who they lost their rights to. I'm sure it's on the internet some where.
No need to be rude just because I got my facts wrong...
Fragile and Frail | Summertime

I'm not a vegetarian because I enjoy eating cute animals.

User avatar
Jace Tsunami
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2002 5:56 am
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Jace Tsunami » Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:37 pm

No I need to be rude because you had no idea what you were talking about, yet you told everyone you were right, and that's what happened. Please don't do that again, it feeds everyone false information, it's anoying, and a pet peeve of mine. A simple "I think it's because" before you said anything would have fixed it.
http://www.punkaddict.com

myspace.com/punkaddict

NME
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2001 1:11 am
Status: nauseating bliss
Location: Far Country
Org Profile

Post by NME » Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:12 pm

DareDevil Sucked
Spiderman Sucked
X-Men Sucked
Hulk will SUCK
X-Men 2 will SUCK MORE.

Movies based on comics will always suck, it's just an obvious fact. Use your brains people.

Affleck is a faggot.
nil per os

User avatar
FirestormXIII
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2001 6:22 pm
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Org Profile

Post by FirestormXIII » Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:30 pm

NME wrote:Suck Suck SUCK SUCK SUCK...
Comics based on movies suck more than anything else you mentioned. :P
Everyone is not the same as you.
Get over it.
And lighten up.

User avatar
Rozard
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 10:39 pm
Org Profile

Post by Rozard » Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:52 pm

FirestormXIII wrote:Comics based on movies suck more than anything else you mentioned. :P
He speaks the truth! :shock:
Image
RichLather: We are guests of this forum, and as such we do not make the rules.
BishounenStalker The freedom to suck is what makes the Internet rock.

User avatar
KhayotiK
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 8:58 pm
Location: Sesame Street.
Org Profile

Post by KhayotiK » Sun Feb 16, 2003 11:18 pm

mmYeah. The origional Crow was based off a comic by James O'Barr, and I don't think it sucked at all.
Image Image

User avatar
Farlo
expectations of deliberate annihilation
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:04 am
Status: The Dark Host
Location: Fort Smith, Arkansas
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Farlo » Mon Feb 17, 2003 12:27 am

daredevil movie = crap
daredevil camic = crap
ben aflec = crap actor
el farlo = ripped off for $9
:(

Locked

Return to “General Off Topic”