Give me your thoughts on this theory.

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:07 am

jonmartensen wrote:What you seem to be thinking of is plurality ed. More than one reality physically and then the intangible ideas.

Dualism is more generally the idea that that which is "real" (discovering just what real means can probably be an entire philosophy major) is the physical world (the tangible) and the mental world (Ideas/Forms).

Monism (singularity) is the idea that only the tangible is real, or the tangible is only a perception of the mind and only Ideas/Forms are real.

I'm using the term duality by definition, that which is twofold, to describe the theosophical and philosophical ideas contrasting oneness against separatedness.
Or something like that

Mr Pilkington · Post by **Mr Pilkington** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:07 am

AnonymousLurker wrote:Iced Mocha

EVIL!!!!
You are a follower of the Starbuck!

R-A-N-M-A · Post by **R-A-N-M-A** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:08 am

Wow! I just discovered the sceret to exsistance following the oppositeism theorum.

This same theorumalso proves and disproves the existance of god, so perspective which is you minds 4th dimention interpertation defines whether he exsists or not. If you say he exsists then by the theorum laws, he must. It works the same way for dissproving his exsistance.

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:10 am

R-A-N-M-A wrote:The best support for the therory is that infinity is truly undifineable. There for folloing the oppositism rules, inifnity cam first which begat unity. With that intact you get equilbrium wich caused chaos. quilibrium is non- exsistance because it is 100% perfectly stable but since, non-exsistance requires by rule an opoosite, exsistance (choas) is spawned since non-exsistance infinitly large 4th and 5th dementionally there for exsistance must also fit that rule there for existance will infinitly grow as non-exsistance infinitly shirnks at the same rate since exsistance it taking non exsistances place in the sphere of the 4th and 5th dimention, tho if it were seen in my last post and the center you would witnesse exsistance infinitly shrink and non-exsistance ininitly grow.

Tho the 5th diemntion to exsist parallel to the 4th, following the rules the 5th contains -infinity and -exsistance and -non-exsistance, where as 4 has inifnitly exsistance and non-exsitance. While following the oppositeism theorum 5th dimention must actually be th -4th dimention. Which fits exactly into math:

A negative times a negative = a positive

In the -4th dimention everything is negative so - is cancelled out and you go forwards but when you look across the ling everything is negative since it is the opposite so to the other side we are the -4th dimention.

I'm not sure what context you're using dimensions in, but there arent an infinite number of dimensions, and there are no negative dimensions :\

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:12 am

Take note, the state of not existing is NOT the opposite of existing. That's like saying 0 is the opposite of 1. It isnt. Negative existance, whatever that may be, that which consumes existance (when you think about it duality and the difference between forces is just simple give and take) is the opposite of existance. Keep this in mind when further theorizing on what existance defines or dosent define :\

R-A-N-M-A · Post by **R-A-N-M-A** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:14 am

Exactly my point. The term dimention in my context referst to you location in spacetime.

Ther are no negative dimentions because since we see them as negative they also see us as negative because the see the opposite, and the opposite veiw of a mirrior hen you look back in time and from a diffrent point in space is the exact same thing as the opposite.

I know thats not very clear but it has to do with your perspective via the line that separats exsistance.

R-A-N-M-A · Post by **R-A-N-M-A** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:16 am

My theory of exsistance is this: I=-I Inifinty = Negative Infinity.

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:16 am

I love having deep philosophical discussions on an amv board at 2:15 AM on a friday morning

if only i didnt have school..

R-A-N-M-A · Post by **R-A-N-M-A** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:17 am

Sadly I do as well.

RadicalEd0 · Post by **RadicalEd0** » Fri Feb 21, 2003 2:19 am

When talking about infinity you're playing with fire. Duality and the concept that opposites define each other can only be applied to so wide a perspective. To put finity vs infinity, dimensions, and existance on that scale seems incorrect. The essence of finity is duality, infinity is a whole nother beast, infinity is characterized by the eternal oneness. Add in the fact that the finite cannot comprehend the infinite (and vice versa) and things become a little more complicated.