Oh god, so I'm not the only one who left the place yesterday with a sour taste in my mouth. I escaped during the middle of the feeding frenzy, because I couldn't take much more of the "Well that was a crappy vid, but I'll give it a +1 for the effort." Either a vid is good or it isn't the amount of percieved effort shouldn't matter. Or the "Well that was a good concept but implemented poorly, I'll give it a +1." This is a video judging contest, not a concept juding contest. And a vocal majority of that group tended to have an inner desire to be elitist snobs. The sad part is that I got the feeling that a lot of them vocalized their ratings of the vids in hopes of receiving confirmation from their percieved peers that they rated an amv correctly.hackerzc wrote:I do have to agree with you on this. For some reason I lost my confidence in the ability of the reviewers other them myself to properly judge the videos. It just seems like last year everything was more formal as more creators were present and only a few non creator anime club members. This year it was the other way around. Only like 4 creators (that's including myself) were there. There was much heckeling going on. I feel that had the creators of some of the vids been there to hear some of the things said, they would have started to cry or something. While I don't like this at all, I must confess that by the third tape even I was following suit, and I am discusted at myself for doing so.
I remember last year when I made my first video ever. I had decided to use akira because the DVD version had just come out. Anyway, I went to the pre-screening and just before my video was shown I heared the smart remark from one of the reviewers "Oh Great an Akira video.....this gets a -2" out loud for anyone to hear. I saw the person who said this this year but did not bring it up because it would not be right.
*shrug* Then again, I guess that I'm a relative newbie and don't understand the intricacies of the elite Otakon crowd.