Instrumental Anime Project

Discussion & organization of Multi-Editor Projects
Locked
User avatar
rose4emily
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by rose4emily » Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:50 pm

Everything from the Fullscreen portion but the intro has been encoded and is neatly indexed and ready to be merged (the merging process is much quicker then encoding, so that's a really good sign for the time to completion).

The intro's taking a little longer than I thought. A lot longer, actually, but it's my computer's fault. It seems to be taking its time on rendering the 3D portion of the intro - at about 1 hour and 15 minutes per frame. The 3D portion - since I don't think I've mentioned it yet - consists of this funky geometric ring thing (its actualy a pair of concentric tauruses cut in a spiral pattern, with rings woven between the two sets of bands, in alignment with the cross-section of the taurus) that I'm animating to spin about the center of its "hole" (to use a doughnut analogy), as well as changing the alignment of that axis to alter its orientation from about 45 degrees off of the horizontal to facing directly toward the viewer, at which point it becomes a circular "window" in which a quick video segment (I've already prepared the video frames, so they're ready to be composited in as soon as the 3D rendering is done) will be shown.

You may be wondering why I've gone and done something this crazy. One answer is that the particle-dissolve effect really didn't look all that great - so I came up with another concept in its place. The other answer is that I am crazy, and I'm (at least to some extent) doing this because I can. It will, however look really cool - and I am saying this on the basis of the frames that have rendered already, not just my imagination of what they're going to look like.

I am going to try, after the frame currently underway is done, rendering a copy of the model where I've specified a metallic texture for both the taurus-binding spirals and the rings held between them - because I have a feeling that part of the rediculous rendering time involved is due to the presence of translucent (and relective - but I at least turned off the refractive part) glass as the material for the cross-sectional rings. Because of those, the whole thing has to be raytraced, with a fairly long number of allowed collisions per ray - and raytracing takes a lot of CPU cycles, even by video standards.

The other thing I have already accounted for to speed up the rendering process is to make use of the redundancies in the ring's form by rendering only those steps in its rotation needed before I can loop back to an already-rendered frame. My framelist is on the other computer (the one that I'm listening to the fan noise of right now, as it's trying its best to not melt), but I've got it down to just over 20 frames that have to be raytraced, and the rest can be scaled, translated, and composited using much faster 2D methods.

The rest of the intro goes as follows:

A few raindrops come in from the top of a black screen and make some pretty silver waves (got this from the Princess Tutu intro - digital fansub source [no DVDs yet, to the best of my knowledge, though I hear there might be some on the way], but I've remastered those frames by hand to make them look sparkly and new for the new encoding).

As the last of the raindrop-ripples (I think there were four) fades out, some slightly wavy text (animated wavy, not static wavy) appears saying "The Instrumentality Project". This text, and all other intro text, is in the CAC Lasko font used for the video bumpers (I think Helen was the one who found it, not sure at the moment). This first title is also on three lines, with the word "Instrumentality" done up with some fancy outline-highlighting to make it stand out.

That text fades out, then some more text, also behind the same "water-surface" effect (I kept the amplitude low and the wavelength high, BTW, so the text is still perfectly easy to read) comes in with the word "featuring".

A similar visual pattern is used for each of our names, in alphabetical order, like so:

Soren Berg (sorry, I couldn't get my text-rendering app to handle the special Sweedish ø).
Kareef Huggins
....
Danial Steinberg
and (yes, there's a whole title devoted to the word "and")
Helen Ye

Then the text concludes with two more titles:

presents

Animasia (this text also has special-outline emphasis)

It's after this point that the 3D wheel/ring-thing comes into view, does its thing, and a bit of "fantasy" video is shown before the viewer "fies through the ring" (really just a cropping/resizing trick) and the first narrative fades into view.

---

On a related note, all of this extra work on the intro (which is, after all, being animated with nothing but still images, shell scripts, a little Script-Fu [that's The GIMP's idea of a macro], and 20-somthing tediously raytraced frames of a POVRAY model) somewhat precludes any opportunity I might have had to refine the intermission (which had to be re-composited to reflect the unexpected change in the character chosen as the widescreen narrator) - so I'm just delivering a shorter version with no "thought bubbles" at all. Since the Intro is supposed to set the mood for the whole film, and the Intermission is something most people will either skip past or use as an opportunity to run to the restrooms or vending machines, I've decided that nailing the Intro is more important than trying to write a mini-comic into the Intermission.

---

I'm still hoping to get the Fullscreen section out to you by tommorow night. If I don't find a way to speed up the rendering process, however, the sheer computational time required will be pushing that out to Wednesday. The good news is that the computer doing the rendering actually does have pretty good ventilation and cooling fans, so I'm not too worried about leaving it running full-speed for a day or two. I'll just open my window and put a towel under my door when the morning rolls around to give it some natural Rochester, NY refrigeration.

I might actually do that now - I'm somewhat surprized by how much heat two computers can throw off when you've kept both of them working almost full-time for an entire day.

---

The end credits will be reusing the same 3D rendered frames. The image tiles are going to be displayed in the center of the ring - rotating with the "video" and "editor" images for each video being used as though they were two faces on a coin. This is only going to be faux 3D (I can get away with faking it where flat square things are concerned - just a couple of transformation tricks), so it will render in a matter of minutes, rather than hours. The text will appear on either side of the ring, with the "header" on the left side, and the "info" on the right like so:

Code: Select all


  Editor:          ***
                 **   **  
                   ***       Editor's Name

except that it will be much prettier than some monotype text and few asterisks.

Credits for things other than videos will have something else in the center of the ring. I actually didn't think of making those tiles until just now - but I assure you it will be something other than a semi-transparent portrait of Osaka's head.

---

So there's a progress update, the story of why I might (possibly for more than the hundredth time) finish a day later than I thought I would, and a breif explanation of what I'm doing with the Intro and End Credits.
may seeds of dreams fall from my hands -
and by yours be pressed into the ground.

User avatar
downwithpants
BIG PICTURE person
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 1:28 am
Status: out of service
Location: storrs, ct
Org Profile

Post by downwithpants » Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:13 am

rose4emily wrote: Then the text concludes with two more titles:

presents
should be "present"


can't go wrong with donuts. sounds nice.
and yes you are crazy.
maskandlayer()|My Guide to WMM 2.x
a-m-v.org Last.fm|<a href="http://www.frappr.com/animemusicvideosdotorg">Animemusicvideos.org Frappr</a>|<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2lryta"> Editors and fans against the misattribution of AMVs</a>

User avatar
jasper-isis
P. Y. T.
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 11:02 am
Status: catching all the lights
Org Profile

Post by jasper-isis » Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:54 am

Sounds mind-numbingly cool; can't wait to see it. :wink:
Image

User avatar
rose4emily
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by rose4emily » Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:25 pm

downwithpants wrote:
rose4emily wrote: Then the text concludes with two more titles:

presents
should be "present"
Using the word "presents" does seem to look a little off, but it is gramatically correct:
The Instrumentality Project, featuring Soren Berg, Kareef Huggins...and Helen Ye, presents Animasia.

"The Instrumentality Project" is the subject of the sentence, "Animasia" is the direct object, the indirect object is implied (the audience), and all of our names are also objects of "The Instrumentality Project", set within a supporting descriptive clause.

I could just remove the word "presents" altogether (leaving a pause between the names and the word "Animasia"). That would get around the fact that the rules of English grammer, as inconsistent and complex as they are in normal writing, don't lend themselves to sentences shown one word at a time.
may seeds of dreams fall from my hands -
and by yours be pressed into the ground.

User avatar
pen-pen2002
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2001 3:39 pm
Location: Grinnell, IA Procrastination Meter: Code Lemon-Lime
Org Profile

Post by pen-pen2002 » Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:30 pm

:shock:

It sounds... Spectacular.
Image

User avatar
Otohiko
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:32 pm
Org Profile

Post by Otohiko » Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:43 pm

Yea, grammatically, rose4emily is right there... though you could stretch it a little and say that since Instrumentality is a group, it could be an antecedent to a verb in plural...

It's the spatial and temporal distance working against the singular here, really. So I guess you could remove it, go with the 'Instrumentality=plural' idea, or rephrase it so that 'Instrumentality' and 'presents' are in closer proximity.
The Birds are using humanity in order to throw something terrifying at this green pig. And then what happens to us all later, that’s simply not important to them…

User avatar
NeoQuixotic
Master Procrastinator
Joined: Tue May 01, 2001 7:30 pm
Status: Lurking in the Ether
Location: Minnesota
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by NeoQuixotic » Tue Dec 07, 2004 1:51 pm

rose4emily wrote:Danial Steinberg
I sure hope you didn't use that spelling. It's Daniel, not Danial. Please tell me its a typo :shock: Its not too big of a problem, but annoying at the least. Beyond that, I can't wait to see what you've been stirring up for this project :D
Insert clever text/image here.

User avatar
downwithpants
BIG PICTURE person
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 1:28 am
Status: out of service
Location: storrs, ct
Org Profile

Post by downwithpants » Tue Dec 07, 2004 3:07 pm

o, i missed the "featuring"

then maybe it could be
The Instrumentality Project
Presents
Animasia
featuring works by
...

to break up the long noun phrase and bring the two most important (at least in terms of recognizability) titles closer together.
maskandlayer()|My Guide to WMM 2.x
a-m-v.org Last.fm|<a href="http://www.frappr.com/animemusicvideosdotorg">Animemusicvideos.org Frappr</a>|<a href="http://tinyurl.com/2lryta"> Editors and fans against the misattribution of AMVs</a>

User avatar
jasper-isis
P. Y. T.
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 11:02 am
Status: catching all the lights
Org Profile

Post by jasper-isis » Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:20 pm

Hmm... I like the idea of just leaving out "presents." That way we still get to save "Animasia" for last.
Image

User avatar
rose4emily
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Rochester, NY
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by rose4emily » Tue Dec 07, 2004 9:47 pm

anubisx00 wrote:
rose4emily wrote:Danial Steinberg
I sure hope you didn't use that spelling. It's Daniel, not Danial. Please tell me its a typo :shock: Its not too big of a problem, but annoying at the least. Beyond that, I can't wait to see what you've been stirring up for this project :D
Just a typo here in in the forum. I used the video bumpers as the source of all name spellings, and checked each one against those bumpers after I rendered it to make sure I didn't make any typos at the command line. The only misspelled name is Søren, and that's because I can't get Northern or Eastern European special characters to show up as anything other than literals representing their UTF-8 escape sequences (like "&#248").

---

I've played out a few Into-wording scenarios in my head (one even converting "presents" to the present imperfect ["presenting"] to remove any specific relationg to the cardinality of the sentence's subject, which still felt awkward) - and the one that seems to look best (at least in my imagination) is to play through the group name and individual names, do a little bit of "fantasy" video (which I'll pull together while my desktop finished up the protracted rendering process for the ring animation), and then bring in the "Animasia" title before the intro's animated finale (the end of the beginning, one might say).

By the way, the thought process behind the abundant parentheticals is just that I write what I'd say, and then write any underlying or related thoughts or clarifications in a parenthetical to make up for the fact that chat-forum interaction doesn't allow for much of an expressive range, visual context, or a conversational style of statement -> question -> clarification. It's difficult to read, at times, but I think it's at least a little more understandable than trying to convey all of that information with a paragraph full of the primary statements followed by a couple of other paragraphs giving notes on that first paragraph. I actually prefer typing the main thought and jotting in everything else with a pen, and some circles and arrows, but that really isn't going to happen here, either.

---

I did simplify the geometry of the ring model to make it render more quickly. Most importantly, I removed the "glass" portions - which eliminated the expensive added ray-tracing calculations caused by the inclusion of curved surfaces that both reflect and refract light. This made the ring look somthing like a 3-D Celtic knot, or something you'd see in a book of M.C. Escher illustrations - which is fine by me. I do have to render more frames now, because the motion of this simplified geometry wouldn't look very smooth otherwise, but the average per-frame rendering time has dropped from 1 hour, 53 min. (I actually underestimated, last time I mentioned how long it was going to take) to just over 9 minutes.

I'm also trying to figure out how to make the model geometry shrink to a a cross-sectional radius of 0. This will allow me to have the torus "grow" out of thin air. If I don't find a way to do this, I'll just use a more conventional fade-type transition to bring it into view.

I did (accedentally) find a way to make the model geometry completely twist itself apart. That produced some pretty interesting results - but nothing that would go with anything else in this sequence.

In short, I have about a third of a clue of what I'm doing right now, this being the first time I've done 3D anything since using CAD to draw walls in 9th grade, when I still thought I was going to be an architect.
may seeds of dreams fall from my hands -
and by yours be pressed into the ground.

Locked

Return to “Multi-Editor Projects”