Rookie of the Year

FoxJones · Post by **FoxJones** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:34 am

I don't think there'll be any contest in this one.. if more people would check out the AMVs made by...

Nostromo_vx
http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... _id=222270

FoxJones · Post by **FoxJones** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:42 am

Stupid me.. forgot that Sivis is also a "rookie"... go figure

http://www.animemusicvideos.org/members ... _id=209751

JCD · Post by **JCD** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:27 am

xRinoa
and
Bakadeshi
and the 2 mentioned above

AquaSky · Post by **AquaSky** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:36 am

I've gotta go with RolltheStampede.

Bote · Post by **Bote** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:21 am

Bakadeshi

DrngdKreationz · Post by **DrngdKreationz** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:26 am

now does rookie just mean that the join date is 2004? or started making amvs in 2004 only? the rules don't exactly make that clear

Scintilla · Post by **Scintilla** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:24 am

DrngdKreationz wrote:now does rookie just mean that the join date is 2004? or started making amvs in 2004 only? the rules don't exactly make that clear

I believe that:
1) the member's join date must be 2004 (meaning Bakadeshi wouldn't be eligible)
2) the member must not have any videos listed as having premiered before 2004 (which is why I wasn't eligible last year)

badmartialarts · Post by **badmartialarts** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:21 pm

Also, the creator should really be a new creator, as in, not having created videos under another name before *cough* or being a paid professional editor who comes in with extensive knowledge already (that second part is my personal view on it, others might argue that). There is no way to really check this unless they are honest, though.

Voices_Of_Ryan · Post by **Voices_Of_Ryan** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:30 pm

badmartialarts wrote:or being a paid professional editor who comes in with extensive knowledge already (that second part is my personal view on it, others might argue that). There is no way to really check this unless they are honest, though.

To me... that second one is very wrong.
Because alot of people practice before they actually release their first video, and that would be like saying they shouldnt be able to practice for a few years.

A good video is a good video. Period.

Maverick-Rubik · Post by **Maverick-Rubik** » Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:06 pm

And then there are a few people like me, who actually edited for the very first time when they made their first video. Yes, the video listed as my first 2 years ago is actually the very first time I've ever edited in a program period.

This is another award I don't think is really sensical either... It always sums up to "first video entered" and not really first made ever.