Navras

Discussion & organization of Multi-Editor Projects
Locked
User avatar
jethropr
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 6:32 pm
Location: Oshawa, Ont
Org Profile

Post by jethropr » Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:40 am

mikestrife wrote:Ok, with Jethropr's help I got the encode alittle cleaner. Let me know what you guys think. If you want better quality still I will do just go over the limit and do like 125mb render.
Alittle cleaner? lol damn, that shit looks great now.

User avatar
celibi87
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:48 am
Location: That one place
Org Profile

Post by celibi87 » Fri Dec 30, 2005 12:43 am

i agree, i stacked them up with my couple video players and it looked a lot better.

User avatar
[Mike of the Desert]
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 5:56 am
Status: Lonely
Location: Earth -> Europe -> Italy -> Rome -> Cerveteri -> Sasso -> Home -> Mike's Room
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by [Mike of the Desert] » Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:32 am

I'll get the latest beta today :twisted:
ImageImage
Image

User avatar
majindan
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: LA,Californa
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by majindan » Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:57 am

Yea it looks waaay better than before but I found some thing in there its on the 1 segment, its not bad but I think u should check it out.
pic
Image

User avatar
Coffee 54
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 8:26 am
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by Coffee 54 » Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:46 am

I'll also confirm my section as FMP:TSR. Intrestingly enough, I originally thought about using both FMP and GSD, but I ran out of time before that idea could get off the ground.

User avatar
[Mike of the Desert]
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 5:56 am
Status: Lonely
Location: Earth -> Europe -> Italy -> Rome -> Cerveteri -> Sasso -> Home -> Mike's Room
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by [Mike of the Desert] » Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:46 am

It looks really clean, the problem is that you used a by far too strong smoothing filter, that make all the video look like in water. You should low the strenght of it! :wink:
ImageImage
Image

User avatar
mixe
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 9:43 am
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Org Profile

Post by mixe » Fri Dec 30, 2005 4:50 pm

Yea it looks waaay better than before but I found some thing in there its on the 1 segment, its not bad but I think u should check it out.
.... wtf is that? LOL I'm hoping it's Mike's mistake and not mine, but I'll look through my project file anyways. Aside from that thing (which I didn't even notice until you pointed it out O.o ) I think it looks great. ^^
Image

User avatar
DarkSchneider
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2001 7:10 pm
Location: A Hole in the ground
Org Profile

Post by DarkSchneider » Sun Jan 01, 2006 9:24 pm

Dont mind me sounding like a broken record, but how much longer will it be before the final version is posted?

User avatar
majindan
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: LA,Californa
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by majindan » Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:13 am

DarkSchneider wrote:Dont mind me sounding like a broken record, but how much longer will it be before the final version is posted?
x2 :wink:
Image

User avatar
[Mike of the Desert]
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 5:56 am
Status: Lonely
Location: Earth -> Europe -> Italy -> Rome -> Cerveteri -> Sasso -> Home -> Mike's Room
Contact:
Org Profile

Post by [Mike of the Desert] » Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:54 am

Michele wrote:It looks really clean, the problem is that you used a by far too strong smoothing filter, that make all the video look like in water. You should low the strenght of it! :wink:
x2 ! :shock:
ImageImage
Image

Locked

Return to “Multi-Editor Projects”