I'm really not looking for a spitting match, but I think madbunny's commentary on the Privacy Policy is a bit slanted... By taking a sentence or two from the original text, sure, it's easy to form a biased opinion.
Example:
madbuddy wrote:Disclose any information about you without your prior consent
Sure that looks bad, but when factoring in the original text:
Divx wrote:Disclose any information about you without your prior consent if we have a good faith belief that such disclosure is reasonably necessary to (1) satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or enforceable government request, including subpoenas from private parties in a civil action; (2) detect, prevent or otherwise address fraud, security or technical issues; (3) enforce the provisions of this Privacy Policy and/or any other agreements between you and DivX, including investigation of potential violations thereof; or (4) protect against imminent harm to the rights, property or safety of DivX, its visitors and/or the public.
If Divx is presented with a subpoenea, of course they're gonna cough up what kind of info they have. Same deal if you're hacking their junk or otherwise violating their ToS.
There's a few more examples... most of them end with "this information is not personally identifiable to you".
I don't know, I just don't see anything all that damnable in their ToS or Privacy Policy. It's all pretty straightforward and typical... that is, if you read the full text. Give it a read, but read the full text.
I can certainly appreciate the desire to steer clear from bloatware and/or marketing-centric software. I stay away from programs like AIM for the very same reason. Ideally I'd love to have an open-source, ad-free alternative, but I don't think that's even realistic.
All-in-all, this just seems like a viable option to hosting high quality videos... for free.