does 23.97fps output = 23.976fps?
- 808-buma
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:40 pm
does 23.97fps output = 23.976fps?
Hey all,
stupid question time - from my editor (Magix Movie Edit Pro 10) I export my AVI files as 23.97 to match my original input files. To make mpeg files, I usually take the AVI file to TmpegEnc and then save it as a 23.976fps mpeg2 file. So, it got me to thinking...
So, I've gone back to my editor and tried exporting it at 23.976fps, but it just rounds off to 23.97 again.
So, question is: for all intensive purposes, is 23.97 = 23.976 or am I just stretching out my vid file still when I try encoding my native 23.97fps AVI file as a 23.976fps mpeg file?
mostly this is just a 'who the hell cares' question, but meh, I was just curious...
Thanks in advance!
stupid question time - from my editor (Magix Movie Edit Pro 10) I export my AVI files as 23.97 to match my original input files. To make mpeg files, I usually take the AVI file to TmpegEnc and then save it as a 23.976fps mpeg2 file. So, it got me to thinking...
So, I've gone back to my editor and tried exporting it at 23.976fps, but it just rounds off to 23.97 again.
So, question is: for all intensive purposes, is 23.97 = 23.976 or am I just stretching out my vid file still when I try encoding my native 23.97fps AVI file as a 23.976fps mpeg file?
mostly this is just a 'who the hell cares' question, but meh, I was just curious...
Thanks in advance!
- Scintilla
- (for EXTREME)
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:47 pm
- Status: Quo
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
- Zarxrax
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2001 6:37 pm
- Contact:
- 808-buma
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:40 pm
scintilla - taking my clips into VDMod like you suggest, the source avi files from my dvd do show as 23.976 and my Magix export AVI file show 23.97...
zarxrax - hmmm never thought of that. So, instead of being .006fps off, I'll be .004 frames ahead?
so, say for a 3 minute file:
23.97fps x 180s = 4,314.6 frames
23.976fps x 180s = 4,315.68 frames
23.98fps x 180s = 4,316.4 frames
so if 23.976 = the "0" point:
so... what does it all mean then? Is it better to make it slightly longer and 'squeeze' AVI down to fit rather than 'stretch' the file to make it fit? I mean, for the 'average' video of 3 minutes, does it make any difference? Or am I doing something wrong?
Just curious...
zarxrax - hmmm never thought of that. So, instead of being .006fps off, I'll be .004 frames ahead?
so, say for a 3 minute file:
23.97fps x 180s = 4,314.6 frames
23.976fps x 180s = 4,315.68 frames
23.98fps x 180s = 4,316.4 frames
so if 23.976 = the "0" point:
Code: Select all
23.97fps-------------23.976fps-------------23.98fps
1.08 frames off----0 frames off----plus 0.72 frames
Just curious...
- Gods Dark Angel
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 10:43 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
This sounds like an awful lot of work for just a lil more or less than half of a thousandth of a frame. Especially if your already at .976 Does it have to be right on point?
Kratos could totally beat up your dad. With his own limbs. Unless your dad is Voltron.
Kalium wrote:Basically, I happened to the local.
- Scintilla
- (for EXTREME)
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2003 8:47 pm
- Status: Quo
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
It does if it turns out that the fractional difference causes the A/V synch to be lost by the time the viewer gets to the end of the video. Which may or may not be the case, depending on a number of factors.Gods Dark Angel wrote:This sounds like an awful lot of work for just a lil more or less than half of a thousandth of a frame. Especially if your already at .976 Does it have to be right on point?
If the synch looks okay the whole way through the video, then I'd say don't worry about it. If you really need the video to be exactly 23.976fps for some reason, you can always hit it with <b>AssumeFPS(23.976,true)</b> in AVISynth, which will make sure the audio stays synched properly.
- Willen
- Now in Hi-Def!
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:50 am
- Status: Melancholy
- Location: SOS-Dan HQ
The longer the video, the more pronounced the sync difference will be.
For a 3 minute (180 second) video:
23.976 fps x 180 s = 4,315.68 frames
23.970 fps x 180 s = 4,314.60 frames <-- nearly 1 full frame off faster
23.980 fps x 180 s = 4,316.40 frames <-- almost 1 frame off slower
Extend it to 6 minutes (360 seconds):
23.976 fps x 360 s = 8,631.36 frames
23.970 fps x 360 s = 8,629.20 frames <-- a bit over 2 frames off faster
23.980 fps x 360 s = 8,632.80 frames <-- almost 1.5 frames off slower
I didn't trust Magix's handling 23.976 fps footage with precision so when I edited my FLCL video, I did it by adjusting clips to 24 fps first like EADFAG outlines for Premiere 24 fps editing. I edited with 24fps sped-up audio, then I adjusted the final export back to 23.976 fps in post. I muxed the original non-sped-up (23.976 fps) audio back in during the XviD compression stage.
For a 3 minute (180 second) video:
23.976 fps x 180 s = 4,315.68 frames
23.970 fps x 180 s = 4,314.60 frames <-- nearly 1 full frame off faster
23.980 fps x 180 s = 4,316.40 frames <-- almost 1 frame off slower
Extend it to 6 minutes (360 seconds):
23.976 fps x 360 s = 8,631.36 frames
23.970 fps x 360 s = 8,629.20 frames <-- a bit over 2 frames off faster
23.980 fps x 360 s = 8,632.80 frames <-- almost 1.5 frames off slower
I didn't trust Magix's handling 23.976 fps footage with precision so when I edited my FLCL video, I did it by adjusting clips to 24 fps first like EADFAG outlines for Premiere 24 fps editing. I edited with 24fps sped-up audio, then I adjusted the final export back to 23.976 fps in post. I muxed the original non-sped-up (23.976 fps) audio back in during the XviD compression stage.
- 808-buma
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 5:40 pm