Relationships and Age Differences

DDR Queen · Post by **DDR Queen** » Fri Apr 23, 2004 9:08 pm

GTO for sure...hes a perverted man trying to sleep with his students

azulmagia · Post by **azulmagia** » Fri Apr 23, 2004 9:17 pm

DDR Queen wrote:GTO for sure...hes a perverted man trying to sleep with his students

My hero...

DDR Queen · Post by **DDR Queen** » Fri Apr 23, 2004 10:18 pm

azulmagia wrote:
DDR Queen wrote:GTO for sure...hes a perverted man trying to sleep with his students
My hero...

lol :XD

ryuu_hime13 · Post by **ryuu_hime13** » Sat Apr 24, 2004 2:19 pm

DDR Queen wrote:
azulmagia wrote:
DDR Queen wrote:GTO for sure...hes a perverted man trying to sleep with his students
My hero...
lol :XD

And it's a realistic scenario too.

)v(ajin Koji · Post by **)v(ajin Koji** » Sat Apr 24, 2004 2:37 pm

Tab. wrote:Lust is the drive to procreate. Love is the combo social need plus drive to procreate wrapped up in a bunch of fancy ass words.
Sex, networking, and the self. That's what human existence is.

I hope it says that in the dictionary

Nestorath69 · Post by **Nestorath69** » Sat Apr 24, 2004 4:27 pm

I look a lot like GTO, now that I got my hair cut... and, since I get more pussy than anyone I know...

DDR Queen · Post by **DDR Queen** » Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:17 pm

Nestorath69 wrote:I look a lot like GTO, now that I got my hair cut... and, since I get more pussy than anyone I know...

XP

danielwang · Post by **danielwang** » Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:41 pm

Nestorath69 wrote:I look a lot like GTO, now that I got my hair cut... and, since I get more pussy than anyone I know...

*points to the sig*

Oh, I don't think we've mentioned the classic.
Strawberry Eggs / I My Me!

Mozilla firebird sucks. I tried it, and it takes 3 more seconds to load compared to IE, and it displays the ASPX files on animetheory.com wrong, even though the mimetype is supposed to be fixed.

Org Profile · Post by **Otohiko** » Sat Apr 24, 2004 11:16 pm

danielwang wrote:
Mozilla firebird sucks. I tried it, and it takes 3 more seconds to load compared to IE, and it displays the ASPX files on animetheory.com wrong, even though the mimetype is supposed to be fixed.

Works just fine for me sir. I'm sure Windows Gundam has hidden code in it to prevent products starting with F from functioning correctly. Apply the infamous F-Hole patch v7.07.3 and it will be better.

As for the subject - well, so long as things are within legal limits, it shouldn't bother anyone. As for me, I avoid generalizations and look at relationships and people specifically

Rorschach · Post by **Rorschach** » Sun Apr 25, 2004 1:53 am

Nestorath69 wrote:
also unabashedly feminine, like the girls we used to have in America back before women's lib and the pornographers took over.
What Puritan era did you just step out from, buddy? Women's lib has been around... prolly much longer than you've been alive, so complaining about a lack of subservient women is the dumbest thing I've heard today. Before women's lib, there wasn't any real rights for a woman. how fucking stupid was that? I'll tell you. It was the ignoramuses that thought women were like possesions. And if you still think along those lines, I hope to god every woman you're around shows you who's owned.

Uh, dude, don't go all postal on me. Sure, feminists have been around for a long time, but the modern "women's lib" movement only really got going in the 1960s. (And yes, that was a couple decades before I was born. So what? For that matter, are you some middle-aged hippie and would it make any difference to this subject if you were?) The suffragettes of the last century brought us women's voting rights, fairer pay, that sort of thing. The modern women's lib movement brought us the gender wars, abortion-on-demand, man-hating stereotypes, and insane arguments over pronoun antecedents and "sexist" language. (Anybody care to give me his or her views on womyn?)

If you think being against all this modern crap automatically pegs me as an apologist for the "women as property" misogynists, those screeching harpy feminists must really be leading you around by the nose. If you're actually in favor of all that crap, I hope all of your girlfriends turn out to be those screeching harpies; may they liberate you from your health, sanity, and happiness, as they've done for so many others. I might add that hating men doesn't automatically make you friendly to women either.

The plain truth is, the Japanese women are freer than most women here in America: while the poor guys over there slave away at work, the women get to stay home and raise some kids, maybe make a little money at a "home job" to supplement the money they get from their husbands, and cruise around town to do some shopping. Any woman who tries to do that here gets to be the subject of hidden envy, open hatred, and prejudice. Other women tell her that she's a parasite and that unlike her, they have "real" jobs. (As if raising children isn't hard work.) Personally, I think any woman who castigates other women for pursuing happiness in their own traditional way is a bitch and parasite herself.

Nestorath69 wrote: Secondly, WTF does pornography have to do with this? The fact is, it doesn't objectify women... I'm sure the poor, helpless defenseless women who are getting PAID to have their pictures taken and airbrushed and processed and sold are crying buckets. I think you're confusing objectifying women and objectifying the sexual acts they portray as the same thing.

I'm not just talking about the actual pornography, but the philosophy which drives pornographers, one which is, by the way, very closely linked to the modern feminist philosophy I've just been describing. Actually, I think pornography objectifies everyone; the men just get less time on the screen. What I'm mainly talking about is how pornography reduced sex to mechanics, taught men that women are just automatic teller machines with three slots where they can deposit their sperm, and taught women that men are just a bunch of walking prongs.

I find it rather interesting, too, that you're accusing me of taking a feminist line that pornography "objectifies" women right after accusing me of having stepped out of a Puritan era. (By the way, wrong era, pal. The Puritans were actually rather progressive for their time. The Victorian era is probably more what you're thinking about.) So which am I? The unregenerate Victorian misogynist who treats his wife and (and several mistresses) like sperm banks, or the preachy screechy feminist who's even more obnoxious because he happens to be male?

You know, there might be something between the extremes... such as a guy who thinks men and women should stop beating on themselves and each other and JUST GET ALONG already.