Nope, you read it right. I use Premiere 6.0 now. And I graduated a couple years ago so it's too late for the student discount. Not that I ever had the money for it when I was a student, anyway.SQ wrote:I thought you were still using WMM?
18-22 range...eh, I think it's more a matter of what they spend it on. In my experience, college girls splurge on nicer apartments while college guys buy a plasma flatscreen (or an AMV editing system) to compensate for living in the ghetto. The money advantage is apparent among college graduates, not students or HS-only graduates.SQ wrote:Girls don't use other programs because they either don't have the money
SQ wrote: or don't know how to pirate.
Quarter-life crisis: a sense that everyone is, somehow, doing better than you.
I'm pretty sure it's partially the difference in the way our brains are wired and partially the stigma that seems to be attached to performing WELL in the sciences for young girls, at least if you can believe the science editor of the <i>New York Times</i>.Shazzy wrote:I'd love to see more girls seriously delving into technical fields. Why they aren't is a bit mystifying to me.
Ohh Where these girls at?Arigatomina wrote:Most "girls" - 18-22 - I know in "real life" are complete and utter doormat morons. They'll put up with anything for a rub on the belly and a kind word now and then.
Arigatomina wrote: I imagine girls who were even younger than these would be even worse on average.
I don't agree with the "girls don't use other programs" - I'd make that "most young ignorant and lazy girls" don't use other programs. That way you make room for the exceptions.Niotex wrote: Ohhh Where these girls at?
I own my editing software. I got an educational version for less than half price.Arigatomina wrote: I thought if everyone on the forum was saying the same thing, surely one of them must be telling the truth. Instead it's a group conspiracy with everyone agreeing to tell the same damn lie (and one or two rich people telling the truth...maybe, if you believe them).
Make that "continent". Unless I'm reading it wrong, two winners were from Russia, while three more were from other European countries. That's half of the people who won right there.Fall_Child42 wrote:As for the VCAs did yu notice that the winners were mostly Russian?
it's not so much what sex you are... but what country you're from :O
I should note that I am terrible at both math and science. I was in high school, and I was in college, even when I tried really, really hard. I spent a small fortune on tutors to make the As in those classes, and I was really only regurgitating formulas that I forgot as quickly as the grades were in. I still have trouble following processes or even doing simple math. Unless I "feel" the process, I'll mess up the steps and get frustrated. That is to say, I have to have an emotional aspect to a set of steps, or else I get confused and my ability to follow order of operations or set priorities suffers. Connected to this, of course, is also when I am upset or frustrated or stressed, these already weak traits are the first to go. I have a hard time being self-confident and relying on my understanding of anything with a long series of actions if I am stressed, upset, frustrated, etc.Scintilla wrote:I'm pretty sure it's partially the difference in the way our brains are wired and partially the stigma that seems to be attached to performing WELL in the sciences for young girls, at least if you can believe the science editor of the <i>New York Times</i>.Shazzy wrote:I'd love to see more girls seriously delving into technical fields. Why they aren't is a bit mystifying to me.
In that case you don't have to worry about proof. The only people I ever doubted were the ones who said they bought it for $500-900 a pop just so they could make amvs. People who work with the program (at some kind of job or school) are entirely different. They have a reason to invest besides the 3 to 5 minutes of enjoyment after the amv is finished.Kionon wrote:I didn't pay for it, and I've never claimed to have paid for it. I worked with it, and my job let me keep it when they phased the position out as an added bonus. Otherwise, I would not have been able to afford it.
I bought my Apple Mac Mini with Final Cut Studio for the sole purpose of using it for video editing. I did spend on the order of $700+ on it. As it stands, I rarely use it for anything but post-processing, although I really, really, really want to cut my umbilical cord relationship with Premiere and use my Mac all the time so I can get away from the day when DRMed Windows will cripple my ability to edit on a PC.Arigatomina wrote: In that case you don't have to worry about proof. The only people I ever doubted were the ones who said they bought it for $500-900 a pop just so they could make amvs. People who work with the program (at some kind of job or school) are entirely different. They have a reason to invest besides the 3 to 5 minutes of enjoyment after the amv is finished.
