Auriga

CrackTheSky · Post by **CrackTheSky** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:51 am

I agree pretty much with GfN...the first 2/3 of the video just isn't really all that special, but the last portion of the video is really hot. The lip sync is bad though...didn't mind it in the first part of the video, but anything after that just looks dumb.

My main problem was the the video didn't really get good flow going...the scene selection was excellent in temrs of complimenting the mood of the song, but the editing just seemed lacking, I had trouble following the rhythm of the video. Which is surprising coming from you.

I also didn't care too much for the song, although I love trance music.

So, 3.5/5 from me. It'll probably grow on me though, given time.

guy07 · Post by **guy07** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 5:55 pm

I'll DL it when you upload a reasonable file size : /

Bauzi · Post by **Bauzi** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:15 pm

guy07 wrote:I'll DL it when you upload a reasonable file size : /

Uhm yes. I have the same complaint here. Is there any valid reason for DivX? XviD is much better than DivX and h.264 is just superior. h.264 is so easy to make with zarxGUI. Just a few clicks and that´s it!
I can´t understand why an editor with a lot of experience uses outdated stuff of codecs.

The file size is just too huge for me. The duration/ressolution/filesize mix just keeps me away from downloading.

h264 edition please ;_;

NS · Post by NS » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:20 pm

Just like I'm still surprised that an editor would use stuff so out of date that they can't even handle close to 200 MB in a reasonable amount of time. It just is mind boggling.

Bauzi · Post by **Bauzi** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:34 pm

That´s a principle. I´m not willed to waste "ressources" and time for such reasons.

Goketsu · Post by **Goketsu** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:24 pm

Bauzi wrote:
Uhm yes. I have the same complaint here. Is there any valid reason for DivX? XviD is much better than DivX and h.264 is just superior. h.264 is so easy to make with zarxGUI. Just a few clicks and that´s it!
I can´t understand why an editor with a lot of experience uses outdated stuff of codecs.

The file size is just too huge for me. The duration/ressolution/filesize mix just keeps me away from downloading.

h264 edition please ;_;

hmm while I kinda agree with that statement I will say this, the quality is quite good and the amv is just plain awesome, and if you do decide to download it you definitely won't be disappointed

NS · Post by NS » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:42 pm

Bauzi wrote:That´s a principle.

NO U!

(it's a play on words :3)

Nostromo_vx · Post by **Nostromo_vx** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:28 pm

Bauzi wrote:The file size is just too huge for me. The duration/ressolution/filesize mix just keeps me away from downloading.

Here you go : short/lowRez/light/wii version

Ayanefan · Post by **Ayanefan** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 8:32 pm

I gave up on Nostromo a long time ago. Whenever I try to watch one of his vids, it makes me very angry because I keep wishing to be able to do what he can do. So I watched about 40 seconds and I couldn't take it anymore.

neorose · Post by **neorose** » Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:07 pm

I remeber the vid that made me not ever want to try and make an amv

after that I thought I could never master those awesome effects.