Lossless

User avatar
AimoAio
Being elegantly...lazy
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:19 pm
Location: Somewhere
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by AimoAio » Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:40 pm

Although I should mention that using VirtualDub & Avisynth is a better method for lossless...what exactly is the problem you get when installing Avisynth? If you could post that here, maybe someone can help you.

User avatar
Kariudo
Twilight prince
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:08 pm
Status: 1924 bots banned and counting!
Location: Los taquitos unidos
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by Kariudo » Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:15 pm

sportsgirl1391 wrote:avisynth wont install onto my computer

What error are you getting when you try to install avisynth?
sportsgirl1391 wrote:and I did use virutal dub.
looks like you used avidemux
sportsgirl1391 wrote:the files are huge.
As Kionon mentioned, this is just the nature of lossless compression
Image
Image

Mister Hatt
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:26 am
Status: better than you
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by Mister Hatt » Thu Sep 16, 2010 1:06 am

Actually I think it's huge because he left it on the default uncompressed AVI, where every frame is a fucking intracoded bitmap. There is a fancy little item in the video menu for compression: use it.

You also still haven't said why you need lossless. What part of "upscaled horribly coded broken framerate and motion" don't you get?

User avatar
sportsgirl1391
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:55 pm
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by sportsgirl1391 » Thu Sep 16, 2010 1:25 pm

Mister Hatt wrote:Actually I think it's huge because he left it on the default uncompressed AVI, where every frame is a fucking intracoded bitmap. There is a fancy little item in the video menu for compression: use it.

You also still haven't said why you need lossless. What part of "upscaled horribly coded broken framerate and motion" don't you get?
bc i didn't know what else to do with these clips without losing quality. Im testing it with these because my cousin burned my Claymore Bluray for me so I could watch it on the plane and they were mkv dual audio. So I am trying different things out before I start messing with my Claymore.
Image

Mister Hatt
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:26 am
Status: better than you
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by Mister Hatt » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:35 pm

Ok two things: firstly, the ORIGINAL RAW you have is so bad that NOTHING YOU DO can make it better. You need to get a better raw; if you live in Japan or know someone who does and has an ISDB-T and B-CAS recording system, they can generate some high-ish quality MPEG2-TS files for you (I have every episode so far but I can't share lol). Alternatively get the DVD, or at least a well made rip of either source.

Secondly, the Claymore bluray is THE worst progressive bluray I have ever seen as far as quality goes. It is a pointresized upscale with horrible deen-like smoothing and some bumpmap distortion. Not exactly something you'd want to watch.

User avatar
sportsgirl1391
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:55 pm
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by sportsgirl1391 » Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:47 pm

Mister Hatt wrote:Secondly, the Claymore bluray is THE worst progressive bluray I have ever seen as far as quality goes. It is a pointresized upscale with horrible deen-like smoothing and some bumpmap distortion. Not exactly something you'd want to watch.
I didn't think it was that bad.
Image

User avatar
mirkosp
The Absolute Mudman
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:24 am
Status: (」・ワ・)」(⊃・ワ・)⊃
Location: Gallarate (VA), Italy
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by mirkosp » Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:02 am

sportsgirl1391 wrote:
Mister Hatt wrote:Secondly, the Claymore bluray is THE worst progressive bluray I have ever seen as far as quality goes. It is a pointresized upscale with horrible deen-like smoothing and some bumpmap distortion. Not exactly something you'd want to watch.
I didn't think it was that bad.
If it's the Funi blu-ray, then yes, it's really bad. If it's some fansubs it might not be as bad, but considering that it's licensed in the US, I'd have bad news for you... :roll:
Image

Mister Hatt
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:26 am
Status: better than you
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by Mister Hatt » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:38 am

There was no Japanese bluray. In fact only Funimation and Madman have released it on bluray, and Madman's is just repackaged from funi with IIRC only two m2ts files switched out (production logo and license warning thingy.) It is so bad that Japan won't even attempt a bluray release of it. Nobody in Japan wants to do bad blurays anymore after the flak that Utawarerumono copped. You can of course find ones that are bad or annoying for rippers but for anyone just watching for the most part they are quite decent. The closest you get to poor quality is fake HD or 1080i on some really old content, Canaan, and Ga-Rei: Zero.

User avatar
sportsgirl1391
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:55 pm
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by sportsgirl1391 » Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:11 pm

mirkosp wrote:If it's the Funi blu-ray, then yes, it's really bad. If it's some fansubs it might not be as bad, but considering that it's licensed in the US, I'd have bad news for you... :roll:
"funi" meaning FUNimation? then yeah its FUNimation. Then I got DBZ Kai part 1 on Blu-Ray.
Image

User avatar
mirkosp
The Absolute Mudman
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:24 am
Status: (」・ワ・)」(⊃・ワ・)⊃
Location: Gallarate (VA), Italy
Contact:
Org Profile

Re: Lossless

Post by mirkosp » Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:18 pm

DBKai is kinda fine, it's 540p on BD AFAIK. But Claymore is just... ugh. If the screenshots going around aren't fake (and I think they are not), then it's some really bad stuff.
Image

Locked

Return to “Video & Audio Help”